Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.105> Article
Research Article

The Post-Pandemic Paradox Between Global Higher Education Marketization and Education Quality: A Case Study of the UK and Australia

Rui WangUniversity of Aberdeen*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In recent years, the impact of education marketization on higher education has been widely concerned and discussed. In the field of international education, the negative effects of marketization are increasing. This study breaks through the traditional argument that "excessive marketization weakens the quality of education", and analyzes the actual performance of higher education in Britain and Australia in the post epidemic era, against the background of Education Marketization from a multi-agent perspective. Specifically, this study adopts a three-tiered framework of "institution-organization-individual" to analyze how the UK and Australia have transformed international students from "educational subjects" into "financial instruments". The study finds that relationships among the state (government), universities, and students are marked by imbalances in rights, gaps in responsibility, and a breakdown of reciprocity. The conclusion is that the international education crisis in the post-pandemic era is essentially a crisis of the global higher education development model. Therefore, this study proposes to establish a sustainable international education ecology with the core principles of "ethical care" and "mutually beneficial development". It also hopes that this research can provide a reference for relevant policies and practices.

Keywords: Higher Education Marketization; International Education; Education Quality; Post-pandemic Era
Published: March 9, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ32085
Volume: CHR Vol.105
pp. 50-56
Download PDF

References

  1. Roshid, M. M., & Seraj, P. M. I. (2023). Interrogating higher education's responses to international student mobility in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 9(3), e13921.
  2. Weber, T., van Mol, C., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2023). International Students as Sources of Income? Moving Beyond the Neoliberal Framing of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 28(4).
  3. St. John, E. P. (2023). Higher Education in Post-Neoliberal Times: Building Human Capabilities in the Emergent Period of Uncertainty. Education Sciences, 13(5), 500.
  4. Boliver, V., & Promenzio, L. (2025). The hyper-commodification of higher education in England in a cross-nationally comparative perspective. Higher Education. Advance online publication.
  5. Yang, P. (2019). Toward a framework for (re)thinking the ethical and political framework of international student mobility. International Journal of Educational Research, 24(5), 518-534.
  6. Marginson, S. (2012). The "public" contribution of universities in an increasingly global world. In B. Pusser, K. Kempner, S. Marginson, & I. Ordorika (Eds. ), Universities and the public sphere: Knowledge creation and state building in the era of globalization (pp. 1988-1992). Routledge.
  7. OECD (2025), "What are the key trends in international student mobility?", Education Indicators in Focus, No. 88, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  8. Bitschnau, M. (2023). Students or internationals? Divergent patterns of governing international student mobility in Germany and the United Kingdom. Comparative Migration Studies, 11, Article 24.
  9. Robertson, S. L., Hoare, L., & Tillman, M. (2025). International student mobility, COVID-19, and the labour market: A scoping review. Comparative Migration Studies, 13, Article 11.
  10. Dollinger, M., & Vanderlelie, J. (2021). Closing the loop: Co-designing with students for greater market orientation. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(1), 41–57.
  11. Tannock, S. (2013). When the demand for educational equality stops at the border: Wealthy students, international students and the restructuring of higher education in the UK. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 449–464.
  12. Stein, S. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of internationalization: Five challenges for higher education. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 12(2), 1–23.
  13. Madge, C., Raghuram, P., & Noxolo, P. (2009). Engaged pedagogy and responsibility: A postcolonial analysis of international students. Geoforum, 40(1), 34–45.
  14. Clark, D. (2025). Markets, metrics, and modernisation: Higher Education strategy makers' conceptualisations of digital empowerment. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 46(4), 550–565.
  15. Mintz, B. (2021). Neoliberalism and the crisis in higher education: The cost of ideology. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 80(1), 79–112.
  16. Yang, P. (2018). Compromise and complicity in international student mobility: the ethnographic case of Indian medical students at a Chinese university. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(5), 694–708.
  17. Tomlinson, M., & Watermeyer, R. (2022). When masses meet markets: Credentialism and commodification in twenty-first century Higher Education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(2), 173–187.
  18. Tran, L. T., & Vu, T. T. P. (2017). 'Responsibility in mobility': International students and social responsibility. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(5), 561–575.
  19. Tsiligkiris, V., & Ilieva, J. (2022). Global engagement in the post-pandemic world: Challenges and responses. Perspective from the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(2): 343-366
  20. Hameed, S., & Lingard, B. (2025). Shrewd marketization: The impact of internationalization policies on curricula practices in a Singaporean and an Australian school. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(3), 763–777.
  21. The Audit Office of New South Wales. (2024). Universities 2023. Retrieved from:https: //www. audit. nsw. gov. au/sites/default/files/documents/Final%20report%20-%20Universities%202023. pdf