Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.101> Article
Research Article

Analysis of Overcoming the Uncanny Valley Theory about Virtual Influencers in Digital Environments

Jiaqi WangUniversity of Amsterdam*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Virtual influencers have been widely adopted in virtual environments, and the metaverse has emerged as a prominent trend in the marketing field. To enhance consumers' purchase intention, marketers and scholars are committed to exploring the application of virtual influencers. Currently, humanized virtual influencers are so humanized that they are indistinguishable from real people. However, due to the uncanny valley effect, high-level humanized virtual influencers fail to gain complete acceptance. Previous solutions have focused on optimizing the authentic appearance of virtual influencers. But virtual influencers cannot fully replace human influencers, as their high degree of humanization tends to evoke discomfort among audiences. Current studies have indicated that the integration of social cues can alleviate individuals' uncomfortable feelings toward non-living digital entities. Therefore, this paper proposes the utilization of both synthetic and human voices to improve the performance of virtual influencers. Meanwhile, the future study could explore which combination (human-like vs cartoon-like virtual influencers and synthetic voices vs human voices) is the most suitable for optimizations.

Keywords: Virtual Influencers; Humanization; The Uncanny Valley Theory; Synthetic Voice
Published: February 10, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ31755
Volume: CHR Vol.101
pp. 138-144
Download PDF

References

  1. Belanche D., Casaló L.V., Flavián M., Ibáñez-Sánchez S. (2021) Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. Journal of Business Research. Aug 1; 132: 186-95.
  2. Sands S., Ferraro C., Demsar V., Chandler G. (2022) False idols: Unpacking the opportunities and challenges of falsity in the context of virtual influencers. Business Horizons. Nov 1; 65(6): 777-88.
  3. Moustakas E., Lamba N., Mahmoud D., Ranganathan C. (2020) Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security) Jun 15. IEEE, pp. 1-6.
  4. Sookkaew J., Saephoo P. (2021) "Digital influencer": development and coexistence with digital social groups. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 12(12).
  5. Gammoh B.S., Jiménez F.R., Wergin R. (2018) Consumer attitudes toward human-like avatars in advertisements: The effect of category knowledge and imagery. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. Jul 3; 22(3): 325-48.
  6. Andersson V., Sobek T. (2020) Virtual avatars, virtual influencers & authenticity. 2020.
  7. Feng Y. (2022) The rise of virtual image endorsement in visual culture context. In 2022 4th International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2022) Dec 27. Atlantis Press, pp. 1622-1629.
  8. Girondini M., Stefanova M., Pillan M., Gallace A. (2023) Speaking in front of cartoon avatars: A behavioral and psychophysiological study on how audience design impacts on public speaking anxiety in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Nov 1; 179: 103106.
  9. Arsenyan J., Mirowska A. (2021) Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Nov 1; 155: 102694.
  10. Salem B., Earle N. (2000) Designing a non-verbal language for expressive avatars. InProceedings of the third international conference on Collaborative virtual environments, Sep. 1, pp. 93-101.
  11. Zhou Y., Qin F. (2022) Research on the Production Strategy of Mobile Short Videos Based on User Comments--Take metaverse blogger Liu Yexi as an example. Art and Performance Letters. Jun 30; 3(3): 40-8.
  12. Manaf A.A., Alallan Y.K. (2017) Examining the effectiveness of animated cartoon as brand awareness in TV advertisement: Evidence from Survey in Malaysia and Jordan. International Journal of Business and Society. Dec 31; 18(3): 427-38.
  13. Heiser R.S., Sierra J.J., Torres I.M. (2008) Creativity via cartoon spokespeople in print ads: Capitalizing on the distinctiveness effect. Journal of Advertising. Dec 1; 37(4): 75-84.
  14. Thomas V.L., Fowler K. (2021) Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. Journal of Advertising. 1; 50(1): 11-25.
  15. Moustakas E., Lamba N., Mahmoud D., Ranganathan C. (2020) Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), Jun 15. IEEE, pp. 1-6.
  16. Ma Y., Li J. (2024) How humanlike is enough? Uncover the underlying mechanism of virtual influencer endorsement. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. Jan 1; 2(1): 100037.
  17. Chen C.Y., Huarng K.H., González V.I. (2022) How creative cute characters affect purchase intention. Journal of Business Research. 2Mar 1; 142: 211-20.
  18. Jiani H., Mingzhu L., Zhangping L., Liqing H. (2021) The Research on Cartoon Image Design and Application of Main Characters in The Legend of the White Snake. In E3S Web of Conferences 2021, EDP Sciences, Vol. 236, p. 05061.
  19. Cheung F., Leung W.F. (2021) Virtual influencer as celebrity endorsers. University of South Florida (USF) M3 Publishing. 5(2021): 44.
  20. Umenai T., Wagner M., et al. (2001) Conference agreement on the definition of humanization and humanized care. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. Nov; 75: S3-4.
  21. Huang T.L., Liu BS. (2021) Augmented reality is human-like: How the humanizing experience inspires destination brand love. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Sep 1; 170: 120853.
  22. de Boissieu E., Baudier P. (2023) The perceived credibility of human-like social robots: virtual influencers in a luxury and multicultural context. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Dec 11; 36(7): 1163-79.
  23. Kim H., Park M. (2024) When digital celebrity talks to you: How human-like virtual influencers satisfy consumer's experience through social presence on social media endorsements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. Jan 1; 76: 103581.
  24. Gutuleac R., Baima G., Rizzo C., Bresciani S. (2024) Will virtual influencers overcome the uncanny valley? The moderating role of social cues. Psychology & Marketing, 41(7).
  25. Mori M. (1970) The uncanny valley: the original essay by Masahiro Mori. Ieee Spectrum, 6: 1-6.
  26. Kühne K., Fischer M.H., Zhou Y. (2020) The human takes it all: Humanlike synthesized voices are perceived as less eerie and more likable. Evidence from a subjective ratings study. Frontiers in neurorobotics. Dec 16; 14: 593732.
  27. Krishan, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgement and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 22(3), 332-351.
  28. Chen, X. (2023). The Influence of Auditory Marketing on Consumers' Purchase Intention Under e-Commerce Model. In the 3rd International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBS 2023). Atlantis Press, September, pp.34-41.
  29. Krawczak, M. (2016). COMMUNICATION VIA BACKGROUND MUSIC AS AN INSTRUMENT OF AUDITORY MARKETING. Journal of Linguistic Intercultural Education, 9(2), 67.
  30. Kim, H. J., Wang, Y., & Ding, M. (2021). Brand voiceprint. Customer Needs and Solutions (2021): 1-14.
  31. Chiou, E. K., Schroeder, N. L., & Craig, S. D. (2020). How we trust, perceive, and learn from virtual humans: The influence of voice quality. Computer & Education, 146, 103756.
  32. Schreibelmayr, S. & Mara, M. (2022). Robot voices in daily life: Vocal human-likeness and application context as determinants of user acceptance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 787499.
  33. Black, A. W., & Lenzo, K. A. (2003). Building synthetic voices. Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University and Cepstral LLC, 4(2), 62.
  34. Wang, R., Juefei-Xum F., Hunag, Y., Guo, Q., Xie, X., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2020, October). Deepsonar: Towards effective and robust detection of ai-synthesized fake voices. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp.1207-1216.
  35. Abdulrahman, A., & Richards, D. (2022). Is natural necessary? Human voice versus synthetic voice for intelligent virtual agents. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(7), 51.
  36. Guzman, A. L. (2019). Voices in and of the machine: Source orientation toward mobile virtual assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 343-350.