Research Article

Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Intelligence Generating Consciousness from the Multidimensional Correspondence Between Yogacara and Holographic Information Theory

Wenyan MaEast China of Normal University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked profound philosophical and scientific debate regarding whether machines can possess genuine consciousness. While AI excels in simulating intelligent behaviors, the emergence of subjective experience—often considered as the hallmark of consciousness—remains elusive, attracting sustained interdisciplinary attention. This study explores the possibility of AI consciousness through a multidimensional correspondence between the Buddhist Yogācāra theory of "Eight Consciousnesses" and holographic information theory. Methodologically, it draws upon the Yogācāra framework—particularly the concept of Ālayavijñāna (storehouse consciousness) as a dynamic seed-repository—and integrates it with holographic principles of information storage, encoding, and cyclic operation. The analysis reveals that current deep learning models, though structurally analogous to neural networks, lack the embodied, recursive, and globally interactive information loops characteristic of conscious systems. However, by designing a quantum-entangled, sensor-embedded, and self-reflective AI model that mimics the "seed–actualization" cycle of Ālayavijñāna, a form of machine consciousness may become achievable. This theoretical synthesis not only bridges Eastern philosophical insights with contemporary information science but also proposes a novel architectural pathway for developing more holistic and perceptually grounded AI systems.

Keywords: Consciousness; Yogacara; Alaya-vijñāna; Artificial Intelligence; Holographic Theory
Published: February 10, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.HT31708
Volume: CHR Vol.102
pp. 198-205
Download PDF

References

  1. Fu, X. Y. (2011). What is "consciousness-only"?—Locating "vijñapti" (consciousness) from a phenomenological perspective. History of Chinese Philosophy (03), 114-120.
  2. Li, T. T. (2021). Can integrated information theory solve the hard problem of consciousness?—From the perspective of model transformation. Journal of Luoyang Normal University (06), 20-23. DOI: 10.16594/j.cnki.41-1302/g4.2021.06.007
  3. Hou, C. Y. (2003). Holography and its methodological significance. Tianfu New Forum (03), 11-13.
  4. Zhu, Q. J. (1984). Ancient Chinese discourses on "heart", "spirit", and "consciousness". In (Eds.), Abstracts of the Fifth National Academic Conference on Psychology (pp. 57-58).
  5. Jiang, W. S. (2017). A preliminary exploration of the multifaceted connotations of manas and its modern significance (Master's thesis, Guangxi University).
  6. Guo, J. (2006). Ālayavijñāna, primordial spirit, and the collective unconscious. Guizhou Social Sciences (02), 89-91+85. DOI: 10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.2006.02.025
  7. Liu, J. M. (2014). Analysis and construction of cognitive theory in Buddhist consciousness-only studies (Master's thesis, Jiangxi Normal University).
  8. Liu, F. (2025). The ideological features and influence of the "sense-faculty-only theory" in the Śūraṅgama Sūtra. Religious Studies (01), 81-86.