Research Article

Research on the Functions of General Extenders from the Perspective of Intersubjectivity

Gaoyuan ZhangNanjing University of Science & Technology Zijin College Xiaojun YangGuangzhou Institute of Science and Technology* Chenghui ChenNanjing University of Finance & Economics

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

From the perspective of intersubjectivity, this study examines English general extenders in interpersonal interaction and their implications for cross-cultural communication. Based on spoken language corpora from existing literature and by integrating politeness strategy theory with the Gricean Cooperative Principle, the research findings reveal that general extenders exert pragmatic functions guided by politeness strategies, which are rooted in intersubjectivity and closely related to the addressee's self-image, covering both positive and negative politeness. Specifically, conjunctive extenders enhance social closeness through shared experiences (positive politeness) and perform a hedging function regarding informativeness in line with the Quantity Maxim; disjunctive ones mitigate tone via alternative possibilities (negative politeness) and maintain caution about information accuracy based on the Quality Maxim. Their intersubjective function relies on the subjectively assumed shared knowledge, experiences and conceptual frameworks between communicators, enabling information omission and listener inference. Mastery of these extenders facilitates smooth cross-cultural communication by negotiating shared knowledge, and the research findings provide solid theoretical and practical support for cultivating socio-pragmatic competence in EFL teaching.

Keywords: general extenders; intersubjectivity; positive politeness; negative politeness; pragmatic competence
Published: February 2, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.31630
Volume: CHR Vol.103
pp. 1-6
Download PDF

References

  1. Channell, J. (2000/1994). Vague Language. Oxford University Press.
  2. Overstreet, M., & G. Yule. (2002). The meta-pragmatics of and everything. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 785-794.
  3. Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles. John Benjamins.
  4. Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(2), 155–193.
  5. Overstreet, M., & G. Yule. (1997b). On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 25, 250-258.
  6. Ball, C., & M. Ariel. (1978). Or Something, etc. In C. Ball & L. Matossian (eds.). Penn Review of Linguistics, 3(1), 35-45.
  7. Silverstein, M. (1993). Meta-pragmatic discourse and meta-pragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.). Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Meta-pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. 33-58.
  8. Wang, Z. Y. (2022). A study on syntactic features of Chinese listing markers de and shenme de. Modern Linguistics, 10(1), 28–35.
  9. Lü, S. N. (1982). Essentials of Chinese grammar [Zhongguo wenfa yaolüe]. Commercial Press.
  10. Traugott, E. C. (2010). (Inter) subjectivity and (inter) subjectification: A reassessment. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (eds.). Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Mouton de Gruyter. 29-71.
  11. Traugott, E. C. (2003a). From subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (ed.). Motives for Language Change. Cambridge University Press. 124-139.
  12. Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff like That. Oxford University Press.
  13. Benveniste, É. (1971(1958)). Subjectivity in language. In M. E. Meek (Trans.). Problems in general linguistics. University of Miami Press. 223-230.
  14. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Schutz, A. (1973). Collected Papers Vol.1: The Problem of Social Reality (ed. M. Natanson). Martinus Nijhoff.
  16. Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. Free Press.
  17. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. Academic Press. 41-58.
  18. O'Keeffe, A. (2006). Investigating Media Discourse. Routledge.
  19. Ran, Y. P. (2002). An analysis of the pragmatic increment of the discourse marker you know. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 25(4), 10–15.
  20. Overstreet, M. (2014). The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders. Pragmatics, 24(1), 105-129.