Research Article

Governing the Carnival: From Extractive Management to Co-Creative Ecosystems in Participatory Fandom — A Harry Potter Case Study

Jingyu XuUniversità di Bologna*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines how participatory fandom is governed within the digital economy and how this is paradoxical in terms of the relationship between fan creativity and extractive practices by capital. The study, by exploring an in-depth case study of Harry Potter franchise, develops a three-stage model through which capital datafies affective engagement, commodifies creative output, and disciplines participatory activities through legal and platform-based mechanisms. The analysis reveals a structural imbalance: while fans produce cultural vitality that nourishes intellectual properties, capital retains control of legal, financial, and informational infrastructures which capture this value. To address this, the paper suggests an Agent-Centric Co-Creation Framework designed to rebalance agency, redistribute value and establish reciprocal governance, shifting fans from unpaid laborers into acknowledged stakeholders in the ecosystems they co-create. The study argues that reimagining governance system of digital fandom is vital for a more equitable and sustainable digital cultural economy rooted in shared recognition and sustainable participation.

Keywords: Fan studies; participatory culture; digital labor
Published: February 2, 2026
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.BJ31605
Volume: CHR Vol.101
pp. 83-94
Download PDF

References

  1. Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
  2. Fuchs, C. (2014) Digital labour and Karl Marx.
  3. Lamerichs, N. (2018) Shared narratives: Intermediality in fandom. In Productive fandom: Intermediality and affective reception in fan cultures, 11–34. Amsterdam University Press.
  4. van Dijck, J. (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208.
  5. TikTok. (2024) #HarryPotter hashtag data. TikTok Creative Center.
  6. Wizarding World. (2023) Show us your house pride! Tag your pics with #HogwartsHousePride and you might just see them featured right here. X.
  7. Weibo. (2023) Official fan creation contest post. Weibo.
  8. Terranova, T. (2000) Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.
  9. Busse, K. (2015) Fan labor and feminism: Capitalizing on the fannish labor of love. Cinema Journal, 54(3), 110–115.
  10. Bourdaa, M. (2025) Archives, preservation, and databases: Creating the cultural memory of fandom. In Ciesielska, D., Lamerichs, N. and Zarzycka, A. (Eds.), Affect in fandom: Fan creators and productivity, 193–208. Amsterdam University Press.
  11. Etsy. (2025) Discussion thread on Harry Potter items being removed. Reddit.
  12. MassivelyOP. (2015) Indie Harry Potter MMO slapped with cease and desist by Warner Bros. MassivelyOP.
  13. Warner Bros. (2023) Warner Bros. Discovery reports first quarter 2023 results. Warner Bros. Discovery.
  14. Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the prison notebooks. Translated by Hoare, Q. and Smith, G.N. International Publishers.
  15. Lessig, L. (2008) Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin Press.
  16. The Guardian. (2025) Harry Potter fanfiction author lands seven-figure film deal. The Guardian.
  17. Lamerichs, N. (2023) Droids on the runway: Fandom, business, and transmedia in Star Wars luxury fashion. In Affuso, E. and Scott, S. (Eds.), Sartorial fandom: Fashion, beauty culture, and identity, 99–113. University of Michigan Press.
  18. Kalmus, V., Bachmann, P., Kõuts-Klemm, R. and Qutteina, Y. (2025) The surveillance survival paradox: Experiences and imaginaries of surveillance in a generational and cross-cultural perspective. Surveillance & Society, 23(3), 312–327.