Constraints and Freedom in Language Choice and Ethics of AI Applications from the Perspective of Compatibilism

Abstract

This paper mainly discusses compatibilism about free will and determinism in language usage. In order to demonstrate the compatibility of free will with determinism, it first focuses on Hume's perspective and classical compatibilism, examining the distinctions and similarities between these two ideas. Second, the topic of language use is covered in greater detail. Finally, it is concluded that people's choice of language in a given setting is influenced by both free will and determinism, and compatibility in language use is demonstrated. It then connects to ethical concerns in AI's work, emphasizing that since AI lacks free will while producing work by copying writing samples, copyright belongs to humans rather than AI. AI may potentially reinforce human prejudices, such as gender stereotypes reinforced by training data. Finally, it clarifies ethical guideline when human use AI. Because Al's job is entirely determined by human order and training data, it lacks the free will to make decisions. As a result, they are neither accountable for or entitled to their copied work. Furthermore, due to social prejudice and the data it consumes, AI unintentionally reinforces stereotypes, particularly in the area of gender. To standardize AI use, we must follow moral norms: guard against bias provided by descriptions of AI, clarify the copyright problems, and improve equality cognitions.