Research Article

The Cultural Phenomenon of TikTok Users Migrating to Xiaohongshu: Investigating Underlying Motivations via Machine Learning and Mixed-Methods Analysis

Xinyu DengTongji University* Jinchen ChiaZhejiang University Sijia WuCommunication University of China

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of “TikTok refugees” migrating to Xiaohongshu (RedNote) as a novel, affectively-driven form of digital cross-cultural adaptation. Moving beyond functionalist explanations for platform switching, we argue that this migration is primarily motivated by emotional responses to geopolitical pressures. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates computational social science techniques—including MDCOR (Machine Driven Classification of Open-ended Responses) for thematic analysis and SENA (Sentiment and Emotion Network Analysis) for emotion detection—with qualitative interpretation, we analyse user discussions drawn from YouTube commentary concerning this migration. Results show that negative emotions (e.g., anxiety, frustration) regarding the potential TikTok ban were the main drivers for migration (H1 supported). Afterwards, migrants demonstrated a significant increase in positive emotions (e.g., joy, belonging) on Xiaohongshu, indicating successful affective adaptation (H2 supported). Discourse analysis highlighted a predominant preference for Berry’s integration strategy in acculturation, where users retain their original digital cultural identity while actively engaging with Xiaohongshu’s community (H3 supported). A positive correlation was also identified between users' emotional attitudes towards migration and their level of cultural engagement on the new platform (H4 supported). By combining computational social science with cross-cultural adaptation theory, this study emphasises the crucial role of affective factors in shaping digital migration and grassroots community formation within global social media ecosystems.

Keywords: Digital Migration; TikTok; Xiaohongshu (RedNote); Machine Driven Classification of Open-ended Responses (MDCOR); Sentiment and Emotion Network Analysis (SENA)
Published: December 31, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2026.HT31073
Volume: CHR Vol.78
pp. 91-108
Download PDF

References

  1. Analyzify. (2025, September 27). 7. TikTok total user statistics in 2024. In TikTok Statistics (2025). Analyzify.
  2. H.R.7521 - Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, 118th Cong. (2024). https: //www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521
  3. Sanders, B. (2025, January 13). TikTok users move to Rednote/Lemon8. Big Rapids News. https: //www.bigrapidsnews.com/news/article/tiktok-users-move-to-rednote-lemon8-20031647.php
  4. Rosenblatt, K. (2025a, January 14). TikTok pushes users to sister app Lemon8 ahead of potential ban. NBC News. https: //www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/tiktok-pushes-users-sister-app-lemon8-ahead-potential-ban-rcna187417
  5. Rosenblatt, K. (2025b, January 14). Chinese TikTok alternative RedNote tops app charts ahead of potential TikTok ban. NBC News. https: //www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/rednote-chinese-tiktok-alternative-tops-app-charts-ahead-ban-rcna187497
  6. Kim, Y. Y. (Ed.). (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Sage Publications.
  7. Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 149–152.
  8. Ward, C. (2001a). The ABCs of acculturation. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 411–445). Oxford University Press.
  9. Dai, X.-d, & Chen, G. M. (2015). On interculturality and intercultural communication competence. China Media Research, 11(3), 100-113. https: //www.chinamediaresearch.net/index.php/back-issues?id=73
  10. Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 177–182.
  11. Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1994). Acculturation strategies, psychological adjustment, and sociocultural competence during cross-cultural transitions.International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(3), 329–343. https: //doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90036-1
  12. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
  13. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https: //doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  14. Leurs, K., & Prabhakar, M. (2018). Digital migration and connected migrants: Exploring ICT-mediated transnationalism. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1243–1262. https: //doi.org/10.1177/1461444817734018
  15. Maeding, L. (2021). The digital archive of diaspora: Blogging (post)migration.TRANSIT, 13(2). https: //doi.org/10.5070/T713258824
  16. Andersson, A. (2019). Digital diasporas and transnational identities. Journal of Digital Culture, 12(3), 45–62.
  17. Kumar, S., Zafarani, R., & Liu, H. (2011). Understanding user migration patterns in social media. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 25(1), 1204-1209. https: //doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v25i1.8089
  18. Jeong, U., Nirmal, A., Jha, K., Tang, S. X., Bernard, H. R., & Liu, H. (2024). User migration across multiple social media platforms. In Proceedings of the 2024 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM 2024) (pp. 436-444). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.12613
  19. Cheng, Y. (2025). The motivation and prospects of the TikTok refugees flocking to Xiaohongshu incident—Based on the perspective of intercultural communication between China and the United States. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 98(1), 29–38. https: //doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.HT24136
  20. Li, M., Xu, W., Gu, W., Xie, Y., Zhou, Y., Dai, Y., Tan, C., & Hui, P. (2025). Rejection or inclusion in the emotion-identity dynamics of TikTok refugees on RedNote (arXiv: 2507.14623). arXiv. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.14623
  21. Wu, F. (2019). Theoretical foundations and practical pathways of empathetic communication. Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 26(5), 59–76.
  22. (Oxford University Press, 2021, definition 2: Oxford University Press. (2021). Oxford English dictionary(3rd ed.). https: //www.oed.com
  23. Ma, Y., & Huang, H. Y. (2025). Emotional infection in intercultural communication: A perspective on observing "overseas users flocking to Xiaohongshu". Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 48(3), 57–66. https: //doi.org/10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.psse.2025.03.018
  24. Lu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2025, July 20). TikTok refugees: Cross-cultural breakthrough and reconstruction under the digital iron curtain.Sound & Screen World, 2025(14), 105–107. https: //link.cnki.net/doi/CNKI: SUN: SPSJ.0.2025-14-034
  25. Guo, Q. Z., Wang, Y. H., & Si, M. J. (2025). A perspective on the "TikTok refugees" phenomenon: User-platform emotional drive and gaming practice. News Lover, (4), 32–35. https: //doi.org/10.16017/j.cnki.xwahz.20250121.001
  26. Wang, J., & Li, Y. Y. (2025). Theoretical interpretation and path innovation of emotional connection interaction in online communities: Taking the migration of American TikTok users to the Xiaohongshu platform as an example. Gansu Theory Research, (2), 106–115.
  27. Zhang, Y. H., & Zhang, Z. J. (2025). A new exploration of ways for social media to break cross-cultural communication stereotypes: Taking the large-scale migration of TikTok users to Xiaohongshu as an example. Modern Audiovisual, (4), 86–88.
  28. Gao, Y. M., & Zhang, B. J. (2025). The convergence of digital technology empowerment and cultural soft power: The folk field of Xiaohongshu's international communication. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 48(3), 75–80. https: //doi.org/10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.psse.2025.03.009
  29. Zhao, M. Y. (2025). Research on empathetic communication of "TikTok Refugee" on the social media Xiaohongshu. Southeast Communication, (5), 59–63. https: //doi.org/10.13556/j.cnki.dncb.cn35-1274/j.2025.05.012
  30. Xiong, X., Peng, Y., Kwong, S., & Huang, A. (2025).Discipline and resistance: The construction of a “digital home” for TikTok refugees on Xiaohongshu. arXiv. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.14465
  31. Huang, Y., & Lai, N. (2025). The differentiation of intercultural communication: Taking Xiaohongshu and the overseas media 'TikTok’ as examples. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 106(1), 33–40. https: //doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.CB24980
  32. Zhao, H., Jia, H., & Ru, P. (2025). TikTok users migration to Xiaohongshu (Rednote): Emotional dynamics, platform governance, and an NCA-SEM analysis in cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https: //doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2530088
  33. González Canché, M. S. (2023). Machine driven classification of open-ended responses (MDCOR): An analytic framework and no-code, free software application to classify longitudinal and cross-sectional text responses in survey and social media research. Expert Systems with Applications, 215, 119265.
  34. González Canché, M. S., & Zheng, K. (2025). Sentiment and emotion network analysis—SENA: An analytic framework and no-code software to integrate natural language processing, linguistic analysis, and data science with qualitative and mixed-methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, Article 16094069251346929. [https: //doi.org/10.1177/16094069251346929](https: //doi.org/10.1177/16094069251346929)
  35. Taft, R. (1977). Coping with unfamiliar cultures. Studies in cross-cultural psychology, 1, 121-153.
  36. Leurs, K., & Smets, K. (2018). Five questions for digital migration studies: Learning from digital connectivity and forced migration in(to) Europe.Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1–16. https: //doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764425
  37. Ward, C. (2001b). The ABCs of acculturation. In D. Sam & J. Berry (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 31–47). Cambridge University Press.
  38. Raftery, A. E., & Lewis, S. (1991). How many iterations in the gibbs sampler? (Tech. rep.). WASHINGTON UNIV SEATTLE DEPT OF STATISTICS. https: //apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs /ADA640705.pdf.
  39. Nikita, M., & Chaney, N. (2020). ldatuning: Tuning of the Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models Parameters. R Project. https: //CRAN.R-project.org/package=ldatuning.
  40. Deveaud, R., SanJuan, E., & Belloto, P. (2014). Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval. Document num´erique, 17(1), 61–84. https: //doi.org/10.3166/dn.17.1.61-84
  41. Cao, J., Xia, T., Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Tang, S. (2009). A density-based method for adaptive lda model selection. Neurocomputing, 72(7–9), 1775–1781. https: //doi.org/10.1016/ j.neucom.2008.06.011