From Diplomatic Rhetoric to People-to-People Connectivity: Language Capacity Building Through Chinese Film Dissemination in Bangladesh
Abstract
China and Bangladesh raised their bilateral relations to a Comprehensive Strategic Cooperative Partnership in 2024 under the Belt and Road Initiative. Although there is an emphasis on connectivity, mutual trust, and shared development, these themes do not always translate smoothly into practice because of comprehension challenges. This study adopts a qualitative case-based approach to examine how linguistic and communicative factors shape the functioning of the partnership. The dissemination of Chinese films in Bangladesh is studied as an illustrative example, showing how policy intentions interact with media routines and the communicative habits of local audiences. Drawing on policy texts, media accounts, and interview materials, the study explores how official discourse is translated into public understanding. The study pays attention to how language influences public interpretations of China and the broader aims of the partnership. Findings suggest that language capacity, including translation, media communication and cultural adaptation, plays a significant role in sustaining people-to-people connectivity and in supporting the effective implementation of policy initiatives, making it a strategic infrastructure for partnership realization.
References
- Zhang, K. (2025). Alliances with Chinese characteristics? The contents and rationale of China's strategic partnerships. International Politics, Published 2 June 2025. https: //link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41311-025-00701-0
- The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2023). The Belt and Road Initiative: A key pillar of the global community of shared future [White paper]. http: //www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/zfbp
- Kallio, J. (2023). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Ambiguous model veiled in straightforward pragmatism. East Asia, 40(3), 229–242.
- Jiang, Y. (2022). Unpacking the Belt and Road Initiative: Does its public diplomacy narratives match its implementation? East Asia, 39(3), 315–331.
- Nye, J. S., Jr. (2005). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
- Semenov, A., & Tsvyk, A. (2021). The approach to the Chinese diplomatic discourse. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(4), 565–586.
- Dai, Y., & Cheng, X. (2022). Global communication of Chinese culture in the digital era: Internal motivation and external challenges. International Communication of Chinese Culture, 9(2), 127–137.
- Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Dennison, S., & Dwyer, R. (Eds.). (2021). Cinema and soft power: Configuring the national and transnational in geo-politics. Edinburgh University Press.
- Guan, M., Chagas-Bastos, F. H., & Nishijima, M. (2023). Winning hearts and minds: Soft power, cinema, and public perceptions of the United States and China in Brazil. Global Studies Quarterly, 3(2), ksad029. https: //academic.oup.com/isagsq/article/3/2/ksad029/7186191
- Zhang, L., Sampurno, M. B. T., & Ismail, M. (2025). Cultural boundaries in humor across Chinese and Western comedy films. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(6), 1163–1176. https: //doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i6/25601
- Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
- Zhang, C., Afzaal, M., Omar, A., & Altohami, W. M. A. (2023). A corpusbased analysis of the stylistic features of Chinese and American diplomatic discourse. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1122675. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122675
- Bassnett, S. (2012). The translator as crosscultural mediator. In K. Malmkjær & K. Windle (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of translation studies (pp. 94107). Oxford University Press.