Social Media and Youth Feminism: The Intersection of Digital Activism, Mental Health, and Belonging
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the mental effects of young female activism and how social media sites affect them. There are some opportunities for young feminists in digital spaces, but this piece identifies notable challenges by examining platform features, regional differences, differences between locations, and hashtag campaigns. The study uses examples from both East Asia and the West to show that social media sites can help people find their identity, get emotional support, but they can also put users at risk for algorithmic pressure, online abuse. In the past few years, internet activism has become an important part of young people's culture. The development is a reflection of larger changes in how people communicate and engage in political activities. The way these things work shows both the strengths and weaknesses of feminist speech online. The results show that female participation in digital media is emotionally complex, affected by cultural settings, and deeply shaped by the features of different platforms. Finally, it is suggested that more attention be paid to digital care, variety, and mental health, as well as the formation of long-lasting online feminist groups.
References
- Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Duke University Press.
- Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. Oxford University Press.
- Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the 'sexualization of culture’ to #MeToo. Sexualities, 21(8), 1313–1324.
- Cho, A. (2020). Queer repertoires of hashtag activism. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2489–2507.
- Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. Oxford University Press.
- Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
- Keller, J. (2016). Girls’ Feminist Blogging in a Postfeminist Age. Routledge.
- Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. MIT Press.
- Yang, G. (2021). The Wuhan diary and Chinese digital activism. Made in China Journal.
- UN Women. (2019). Generation Equality and Youth Activism. https: //www.unwomen.org
- Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?” Social Media + Society, 2(1), 1–17.
- Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2019). Youth collective political expression on social media. New Media & Society, 21(9), 1988–2009.
- TikTok Transparency Center. (2023). Community Guidelines Enforcement Report. https: //www.tiktok.com/transparency
- Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2018). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Social Media + Society.
- Clark, R. (2016). Hope in a hashtag: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788–804.
- Kuo, R. (2018). Racial justice activist hashtag publics on Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 494–512.
- Tiidenberg, K. (2016). Selfies, Social Media, and the Culture of Self-Representation. Routledge.
- Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Jane, E. A. (2017). Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History. Sage.
- Mantilla, K. (2015). Gendertrolling: How Misogyny Went Viral. Praeger.
- Chae, J. (2018). Explaining females’ envy toward social media influencers. Media Psychology, 21(2), 246–262.
- Bishop, S. (2020). The attention economy. New Media & Society, 22(11), 2031–2049.
- Brough, M., & Litman, B. (2021). Fatigue and burnout in digital activism. Information, Communication & Society.
- Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press.
- Gill, R. (2018). The affective, cultural, and emotional labours of activism. Feminist Media Studies, 18(2), 145–161.
- Banaji, S., & Buckingham, D. (2013). The Civic Web: Young People, the Internet and Civic Participation. MIT Press.
- Blackwell, L., et al. (2019). When online harassment is perceived as justified. New Media & Society, 21(5), 1030–1048.
- Marwick, A. (2013). Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. Yale University Press.
- Nakamura, L. (2015). “I WILL DO EVERYthing that am asked”: Digital femininity and race in online feminism. Digital Culture & Society, 1(1), 113–128.
- Chun, W. H. K. (2016). Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. MIT Press.
- Valenti, J. (2014). The Purity Myth: How America’s Obsession with Virginity Is Hurting Young Women. Seal Press.
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
- Dobson, A. S. (2019). Instagram and the aesthetics of activism. In R. Gill & A. Kanai (Eds.), Mediated Intimacies. Routledge.
- Liu, W. (2020). Feminist resistance and the #MeToo movement in China. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 26(3), 367–382.
- Jung, E. Y. (2022). South Korean feminist movements online. Feminist Media Histories, 8(1), 89–110.
- Tsai, W. (2021). Youth feminism and pop culture activism in Taiwan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 22(4), 602–615.
- Lee, H. (2023). Internal conflicts in East Asian digital feminism. International Journal of Cultural Studies.
- Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press..