To What Extent is Shostakovich’s Oratorio Song of the Forests a Survival Strategy of Protecting His Career under Stalinist Ideological Control Rather than an Artwork of Genuine Individual Expression
Abstract
The Soviet Union limited the creation of musical pieces by composers during Stalin’s reign. The state gradually strengthened the degree of ideological control from the 1930s to the 1940s, forcing composers to create music works that enhanced the Soviet ideologies and followed the Socialist Realist style. This paper focuses on Dmitri Shostakovich’s works and his music career under Stalinist rule, aiming to evaluate how his works and his attitude towards state control were affected. By using his oratorio Song of the Forests as a case study, this paper examines the extent to which this oratorio is a genuine artistic expression of Shostakovich or represents his conformity to the strict doctrine. The musical score of this oratorio reveals several features that align with Socialist Realist expectations. Considering the historical context of the increasing severity of censorship, this paper argues that this oratorio implied Shostakovich’s adaptation to state control, functioning more as a survival strategy rather than an artwork. This investigation displays the effects of censorship on cultural diversity and artistic freedom, as well as reflecting the difficulty of maintaining individual expression under state oppression.
References
- Kircher, Liam. 2023. "Western Art Music in the Soviet Union during the Reign of Stalin, 1924-1953." Providence College Digital Commons. https: //digitalcommons.providence.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003& context=music_students#page=2.82
- Tirman, Michael. 2011. “Socialist Realism and Soviet Music: The Case of Dmitri Socialist Realism and Soviet Music: The Case of Dmitri Shostakovich Shostakovich.” https: //digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102& context=ugtheses.
- Frolova-Walker, Marina. 2009. “The Glib, the Bland, and the Corny: An Aesthetic of Socialist Realism.” In Music and Dictatorship in Europe and Latin America, edited by Roberto Illiano and Massimiliano Sala, 403–23. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
- White, Richard H. R. 2008. “Shostakovich versus the Central Committee: the Power of Music.” Clinical Medicine (London) 8 (4): 405–409. https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4952934/
- Strayer, Hope R. 2013. “Altered but Not Silenced: How Shostakovich Retained His Voice as an Artist despite the Demands of a Dictator.” Musical Offerings 4 (2): Article 2. Cedarville University. https: //digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/musicalofferings/vol4/iss2/2.
- Pravda. 1936. “Muddle instead of Music.” Pravda, January 28, 1936. Archived at Wayback Machine. https: //web.archive.org/web/20110127123117/http: //www.arnoldschalks.nl/tlte1sub1.html.
- Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). 1932. “Reconstruction of Literary and Artistic Organizations.” Seventeen Moments in Soviet History. Michigan State University. Accessed September 10, 2025. https: //soviethistory.msu.edu/1934-2/writers-congress/writers-congress-texts/reconstruction-of-literary-and-artistic-organizations/.
- Tarakano Notes. n.d. “ [Full Score] Shostakovich – Song of the Forests (oratorio), Op. 81.” YouTube. Accessed September 10, 2025. https: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqkxghfTuU4.
- Smith, Roger W. 2018. “Shostakovich, ‘Песнь о лесах’ (the Song of the Forests).” Roger’s Gleanings. December 2, 2018. https: //rogersgleanings.com/2018/12/02/shostakovich-%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BD%D1%8C-%D0%BE-%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0%D1%85-the-song-of-the-forests/.