Research Article

Balancing Development and Conservation:ACriticalAnalysis of the High Vale Film Studio Project and Its Implications for Green Belt Policy

Zhuoxin FanUniversity College London*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The Green Belt policy has played a key role in curbing the spread of cities and protecting open landscapes in the UK. However, in recent decades, the growing demand for housing and the pressure on economic development have made it face increasing challenges. This study takes the fictional High Vale Film Studio Project as an example to explore how to coordinate the relationship between urban expansion and environmental protection and social welfare. Based on literature review and multi-stakeholder analysis, this article points out that the realization of sustainable results depends on conditional and flexible strategies, such as establishing strong ecological safeguards, promoting meaningful public participation and policy innovation. These measures will make it possible to carefully adjust land use. The results of the study provide a practical framework for reforming Green Belt policies, balancing development needs and long-term sustainability, and also provide a reference for other urban and rural marginal areas facing similar growth pressure.

Keywords: green belt policy; urban planning; sustainable development; stakeholder analysis; high vale
Published: November 5, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.29055
Volume: CHR Vol.94
pp. 101-107
Download PDF

References

  1. Bishop, P., Perez Martinez, A., Rogemma, R. and Williams, L., 2020. Repurposing the green belt in the 21st century. UCL press.
  2. Greenwood, M.R. and Simmons, J., 2004. A stakeholder approach to ethical human resource management. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(3), pp.3-23.
  3. Breslin, M. and Buchanan, R., 2008. On the case study method of research and teaching in design. Design Issues, 24(1), pp.36-40.
  4. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J., 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), pp.853-886.
  5. Voith, R.P. and Wachter, S.M., 2009. Urban growth and housing affordability: The conflict. The Annals of the American academy of political and social science, 626(1), pp.112-131.
  6. Kallergis, A., Angel, S., Liu, Y., Blei, A.M., Sanchez, N. and Lamson-Hall, P., 2022. Housing affordability in a global perspective. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  7. SDSN, 2013. Why the world needs an urban sustainable development goal.
  8. Jeurissen, R., 2000. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business.
  9. Andrén, H., 1997. Habitat fragmentation and changes in biodiversity. Ecological bulletins, pp.171-181.
  10. Paavola, J. and Hubacek, K., 2013. Ecosystem services, governance, and stakeholder participation: an introduction. Ecology and Society, 18(4).
  11. Schroth, O., Hayek, U.W., Lange, E., Sheppard, S.R. and Schmid, W.A., 2011. Multiple-case study of landscape visualizations as a tool in transdisciplinary planning workshops. Landscape Journal, 30(1), pp.53-71.
  12. Knight-Lenihan, S., 2020. Achieving biodiversity net gain in a neoliberal economy: The case of England. Ambio, 49(12), pp.2052-2060.
  13. Natoli, S.J., 1971. Zoning and the development of urban land use patterns. Economic Geography, 47(2), pp.171-184.