The Role of Moral Emotions in Interpersonal Repair: Implications for Education and Social Context
Abstract
The role of moral emotions in repairing interpersonal relationships is one of the most important research topics. Based on existing studies, researchers have systematically explained the role of moral emotions in interpersonal relationship repair. However, there are still some gaps in these studies, such as deeply relying on a single situation and not elaborating on the chain role of different moral emotions. Therefore, the research theme of this thesis is the role of three moral emotions (guilt, embarrassment, and compassion) in interpersonal repair and their application in educational situations. In general, this article adopts the evaluation literature review method to objectively review the existing research and add further discussion. The results show that guilt can stimulate the motivation of individuals to take recovery actions. Embarrassment as a signal of willingness to repair. Empathy stimulates the ability of transpositional consideration and tolerance. The chain interaction between them can be summarized as embarrassment causes individuals to 'want to repair’, guilt causes individuals to 'make behaviors of repair’, and empathy causes repair to be 'accepted’. This mechanism is also applicable in the education scenario, and specific practical measures include empathy training, teachers' apology guidance, etc. In general, this paper further analyzes the chain role of three kinds of moral emotions and proposes reasonable practical measures for repairing interpersonal conflicts at the educational level. However, there are also shortcomings, such as the neglect of longitudinal research and cross-cultural research, which provide a direction for future research.
References
- Sarfraz S., Kiran S., & Nazim F. (2025). Interpersonal and academic conflicts among university students: A case study of institutions in Islamabad and Rawalpindi. Journal for Social Science Archives, 3(2), 367–391. https: //doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i2.244
- Sadiq N., Naseer K., Batool S., Arif A., Nisar A., Ali H. A., & Atta-Ur-Rehman. (2025). Investigating the predictive role of romantic relationship conflict in psychological well-being, self-esteem, and academic performance among university students. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(2), 2230–2241.
- Haidt J. (2003). The moral emotions. In Davidson R. J., Scherer K. R., & Goldsmith H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
- Tangney J. P., Stuewig J., & Mashek D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
- Bagdasarov Z., Connelly S., & Johnson J. F. (2019). Denial and empathy: Partners in employee trust repair? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 19. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00019
- Durkheim, É. (1893). The division of labor in society. Free Press.
- Reinders Folmer C. P., Wildschut T., Haesevoets T., De Keersmaecker J., Van Assche J., & Van Lange P. A. M. (2021). Repairing trust between individuals and groups: The effectiveness of apologies in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. International Review of Social Psychology, 34, Article 14, 1–15. https: //doi.org/10.5334/irsp.479
- Ferrar S. J., Stack D. M., Baldassarre K. S., Orsini A., & Serbin L. A. (2021). Conflict resolution and emotional expression in sibling and mother-adolescent dyads: Within-family and across-context similarities. Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(6), 833–855. https: //doi.org/10.1177/02724316211001747
- Tyler T. R., & Lind E. A. (2009). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.003
- Lalot F., Mastroianni C., & Stathi S. (2025). Unpacking trust repair in couples: A systematic literature review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Advance online publication. https: //doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483
- Tangney J. P., Miller R. S., Flicker L., & Barlow D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1264. https: //doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1256
- Abbate C., Boca S., & Spadaro G. (2022). The role of guilt and empathy on prosocial behavior. Current Psychology, 41(9), 6399–6408. https: //doi.org/10.3390/bs12030064
- Greenbaum R., Bonner J., Gray T., & Mawritz M. (2020). Moral emotions: A review and research agenda for management scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41, 95–114. https: //doi.org/10.1002/job.2367
- Thompson N. M., van Reekum C. M., & Chakrabarti B. (2021). Cognitive and affective empathy relate differentially to emotion regulation. Affective Science, 3(3), 118–134. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00062-w
- Guo H., Zhou H., Wang J., & Liu W. (2023). Associations between empathy and negative affect: Effect of emotion regulation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(6), 892–904. https: //doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00892
- Safdari A. (2024). Toward an empathy-based trust in human-otheroid relations. AI & Society, Advance online publication. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02155-z
- Miller R. S. (1995). Embarrassment and social behavior. In Tangney J. P., & Fischer K. W. (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 322–339). Guilford Press.
- Šipka D., Vlasenko B., Stein M., Dierks T., Magimai-Doss M., & Morishima Y. (2025). Multidisciplinary characterization of embarrassment through behavioral and acoustic modeling. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 9643. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94051-9
- LaBarre, W. (1947). The cultural basis of emotions and gestures. Journal of Personality, 16(1), 49–68. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1947.tb01019.x
- Keltner D., & Buswell B. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 250–270. https: //doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.250