Disenchanting Modern Myths: A Critique of Linguistic-Geographical Determinism in the Narratives of Maritime and Agricultural Civilizations
Abstract
In recent years, the concepts of maritime and agricultural civilizations have attracted growing attention, particularly in Chinese social media and cross-cultural discussions. These narratives are not only popular in public discourse but also quoted in academic debates about the relationship between geography, civilization, and language. This study critically examines this pervasive dichotomy. While some scholars argue that geography shapes civilization, which in turn shapes language development through distinct scripts, grammar, and pragmatics, this paper challenges the validity and generalizability of such claims. The fundamental flaw lies in the assumption that a civilization is shaped by a single dominant geographical environment, ignoring the reality that civilizations often coexist and interact within diverse geographical contexts. Based on this flawed premise, linguistic-geographical determinism also oversimplifies complex historical and cultural factors and relies on limited qualitative data. Evidence from various linguistic cases further refutes the notion that geography alone determines linguistic development. By pointing out the limitations of this dichotomy and uncovering its ideological underpinnings, this study emphasizes the need to move beyond colonial-era frameworks and adopt a more nuanced, diverse perspective on civilization. This work contributes to the broader discourse on postcolonial studies and highlights the importance of critically examining ideological influences in academic research.
References
- Gu, Z. (2007) Introduction to the Comparison between Chinese and Western Cultures. Peking University Press, Beijing.
- Liu, Z. (2019) On the essence of the cultural differences between China and the West from the perspective of linguistics. Journal of Yunnan Minzu University (Social Sciences), 45: 59-65.
- Wang, Y. (2024) Exploring the Cultural Differences of English and Chinese Euphemisms in Cross cultural Communication. http: //www.sinoss.net
- Montesquieu, C. (1748) De l’esprit des loix. J. Barrillot, Geneva.
- Toynbee, A. (1934) A Study of History. Oxford University Press, London.
- Umesao, T. (1957) Prolegomena of an Ecological View of the History of Civilization. Chūō Kōron, 822: 32-49.
- Huntington, S. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster, New York.
- Yan, S. & Zhang, S. (2020) Compulsory Education Textbook History: Chinese and Foreign Historical Outlines (Volume 2). People’s Education Press, Beijing.
- Lu, J. (2019) Comments on the Study of Modern Chinese Grammar in Recent Hundred Years. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 302: 1-14.
- Papakitsos, E. & Kenanidis, I. (2016) Cretan Hieroglyphics: The Ornamental and Ritual Version of the Cretan Protolinear Script. Anistoriton Journal, 15: 1-12.
- Anthony, D. & Ringe, D. (2015) The Annual Review of Linguistics, 1: 199-219.
- World Economic History Editorial Group. (2019) World Economic History. Higher Education Press, Beijing.
- Silk Road Impression. (2025) Analysis of the Development History and Current Situation of Greek Agriculture. http: //zcqtz.com.
- Pan, R. (2015) The Historical Changes of Chinese Traditional Ocean Books. Doctor’s thesis, Xiamen University.
- Morin, E. (1992) La Méthode, tome 4: Les Idées. Cátedra, Madrid.
- Mascat, J. (2024) Hegel, Colonialism and Postcolonial Hegelianism. Cambridge University Press.
- Wang, M. (2017) Some Turns in a “Journey to the West”: Cosmological Proliferation in an Anthropology of Eurasia. Journal of the British Academy, 5: 201-250.
- Yang, N. & Zheng, L. (2005) Comments on “The Historical View of Civilization from the View of Ecology” by Umesao Tadao. Journal of Historical Science, 8: 92-98.
- Lu, H. (2024) The Securitization Transformation of Japan’s Maritime Strategy: Context, Characteristics and Actions. Japanese Studies, 3: 82-170.
- Bhabha, H. (1994) The Location of Culture. Routledge, London.