Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.90> Article
Research Article

Free Will and Determinism: Can Humans Be Morally Responsible Agents?

Zihe WangThe Hill School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper aims to examine whether agents are to be held morally responsible for their actions in a deterministic world. In order to do so, the paper puts the most demanding species of moral responsibility, accountability, at its center and argues for a compatibilist framework grounded in guidance control. Where actions issue from an owned, adequately reasons-responsive mechanism. Main central concepts are explicitly clarified, such as leeway vs. source-hood interpretations of what is necessary to be free, and introducing different perspectives on the topic at hand. It then evaluates the Compatibilism argument against the Incompatibilism, including notable classical arguments and critiques. Building on Fischer and Ravizza’s model, the paper defends reasons-responsiveness and historical ownership as sufficient for responsibility in the absence of “freewill.” This paper seeks to align theory with intuition, such that the intuitive sense of morality does not diminish and preserve the desert-based evaluation, the integrity of blame, praise, and sanction within a causally ordered world.

Keywords: free will; determinism; moral responsibility; compatibilism
Published: October 23, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.ND28262
Volume: CHR Vol.90
pp. 19-26
Download PDF

References

  1. van Inwagen, P. (1983) An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Ginet, C. (1996) In Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: Why I Don’t Find Frankfurt’s Argument Convincing. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 403–417.
  3. Kane, R. (1996) The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Frankfurt, H. G. (1969) Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829–839.
  5. Fischer, J. M. and Ravizza, M. (1998) Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Vihvelin, K. (2013) Causes, Laws, and Free Will: Why Determinism Doesn’t Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Pereboom, D. (2001) Living Without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Levy, N. (2011) Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Watson, G. (1996) Two Faces of Responsibility. Philosophical Topics, 24(2), 227–248.
  10. Shoemaker, D. (2011) Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility. Ethics, 121(3), 602-632.
  11. Strawson, P. F. (1962) Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 187–211.
  12. Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 77-91.
  13. Watson, G. (1987) Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. In F. D. Schoeman (ed.) Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256–286.
  14. O’Connor, T. (2022) Free Will. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https: //plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/freewill/
  15. Ginet, C. (1990) On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. van Inwagen, P. (1975) The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism. Philosophical Studies, 27, 185–199.
  17. Ayer, A. J. (1954) Freedom and Necessity. In A. J. Ayer. Philosophical Essays. London: Macmillan, 271–284.
  18. Lewis, D. (1981) Are We Free to Break the Laws? Theoria, 47, 113–121.
  19. McKenna, M. and Coates, D. J. (2024) Compatibilism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https: //plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/compatibilism/
  20. Widerker, D. (1995) Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. The Philosophical Review, 104, 247–261.
  21. Pereboom, D. (2014) Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Talbert, M. (2025) Moral Responsibility. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https: //plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/moral-responsibility/
  23. Mele, A. and Robb, D. (1998) Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58, 162–173.
  24. Fischer, J. M. (1994) The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control. Oxford: Blackwell.
  25. Wolf, S. (1990) Freedom Within Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. List, C. (2019) Why Free Will Is Real. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.