Research Article

Carnival as Self-Help: Discussing a Rebellious Spirit in Camus’ L’Étranger

Ruiqi ZhuBeijing University of Chemical Technology*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper challenges the dominant interpretation of Meursault in L’Étranger as a passive absurdist, arguing instead that he performs a nonverbal, carnivalesque form of existential rebellion. Drawing on Albert Camus’ theory of the absurd and Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of carnival and grotesque realism, the study proposes a three-stage model of Meursault’s defiance: his initial refusal of symbolic norms, his construction of a second world rooted in bodily sensation, and his final affirmation of death as a meaningful end. The grotesque and sensory elements in Meursault’s perception displace abstract morality, revealing a rebellion enacted not through rhetoric, but through embodied experience. The courtroom, far from subjugating him, becomes a stage for non-cooperation and existential autonomy. Ultimately, Meursault emerges as a carnival figure who says both “no” to imposed meaning and “yes” to the material rhythms of life. His revolt is not rhetorical but visceral—a grotesque affirmation of life under the shadow of death.

Keywords: L’Étranger; Meursault; Absurdity; Carnival; Rebellion
Published: October 23, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.HT28025
Volume: CHR Vol.94
pp. 41-46
Download PDF

References

  1. Morreale, Gerald. “Meursault's absurd act.” The French Review 40.4 (1967): 456–462.
  2. Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus. Trans. Justin O’Brien. London: Penguin, 2005. Print.
  3. Sagi, Abraham. Albert Camus and the Philosophy of the Absurd. Vol. 125. Rodopi, 2002.
  4. Caraway, James E. “Albert Camus and the Ethics of Rebellion.” Mediterranean Studies 3 1992: 125–136.
  5. Zepp, Evelyn H. “Albert Camus and the Popular Tradition.” Orbis Litterarum 1983, no. 38 (1983): 338-362.
  6. Camus, Albert. The Stranger. Trans. Matthew Ward. New York: Vintage, 1989. Print.
  7. Camus, Albert. The Rebel. Trans. Alfred A. Knopf. New York, 1954. Print.
  8. Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World, trans. Helene Iswolsky (Cambridge: M. I. T. Press, 1968), p. 9. Further references will be indicated in the text as Rabelais.
  9. Cruickshank, John. Albert Camus and the Literature of Revolt (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960), p. 226 [quoted from Germaine Brte, “Introduction to Albert Camus, ” French Studies, 4 (January 1950), p. 341.
  10. Danow, David K., “The Spirit of Carnival: Magical Realism and the Grotesque” (1995). Comparative Literature. 2. https: //uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_comparative_literature/2.
  11. Leite, F. B.. (2023). Realismo grotesco e corpo grotesco em Bakhtin. Bakhtiniana: Revista De Estudos Do Discurso, 18(4), e62064p. https: //doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573p62064.
  12. Pölzler, Thomas. “Absurdism as Self-Help: Resolving an Essential Inconsistency in Camus’ Early Philosophy.” Journal of Camus Studies 2014, (2014): 91-102.