Research Article

Review of Research on the Transfer of L3 (German) to L2 (English) Learning among Native Chinese Speakers

Xiaoyue WuBeijing International Studies University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Based on L1 Chinese, this study examines the multidirectional transfer mechanisms among Chinese (L1), English (L2), and German (L3), highlighting bidirectional influences beyond traditional unidirectional models. It explores how L3 German acquisition impacts L2 English across phonetic, lexical, and syntactic levels, mediated by L1 Chinese. Key findings reveal that typological proximity between English and German intensifies transfer, while L2 proficiency and L3 exposure duration modulate its direction and strength. Effective trilingual strategies involve three interconnected approaches. Firstly, leverage the linguistic proximity between English and German by designing explicit comparative training on phonological, lexical, and grammatical similarities and differences to foster positive cross-linguistic transfer while mitigating interference. Secondly, prioritize the consolidation of foundational L2 English proficiency, encompassing core grammar and high-frequency vocabulary, to establish a stable system resilient to L3 influence; this involves sustained L2 maintenance activities and, for advanced learners, structured language-switching tasks to enhance metalinguistic awareness. Thirdly, manage initial L3 exposure through a graduated model starting with limited, structured input, progressively increasing intensity as learners gain explicit control over L2-L3 boundaries, with conscious monitoring strategies and instructor collaboration to track and counteract unintended reverse transfer effects.

Keywords: Third Language Acquisition; Language Transfer; Bidirectional Transfer
Published: October 23, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.HT27994
Volume: CHR Vol.85
pp. 33-39
Download PDF

References

  1. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  2. Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of additive bilingualism on third language acquisition: A comparison of Basque-English bilinguals and English monolinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(2), 153-167.
  3. Jaensch, C. (2019). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Phonological, lexical, and syntactic transfer from L1 German and L2 English to L3 Spanish. Second Language Research, 35(4), 469-494.
  4. Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2020). Reverse transfer in multilinguals: L3 Dutch influencing L2 English and L1 Swedish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 973-987.
  5. Singleton, D. (2005). Perspectives on multilingualism. In D. Singleton & A. Little (Eds.), Applied linguistics: Critical concepts in language studies (pp. 179-197). Routledge.
  6. de Bot, K. (2008). The dynamic systems theory of second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 137-151). Routledge.
  7. Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. In J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (Eds.), Trends in bilingual acquisition (pp. 195-208). John Benjamins.
  8. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.
  10. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 233-277). York Press.
  11. Rothman, J. (2015). The L2 status factor in third language acquisition: Evidence from L3 Romance. Second Language Research, 31(2), 217-242.
  12. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459-484.
  13. Bylund, E., Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2022). The dynamics of L3 influence on L2: A longitudinal study of Swedish-English-Dutch multilinguals. Language Learning, 72(1), 159-191.
  14. Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2013). Reverse transfer in multilingual phonology: The case of L3 Dutch influencing L2 English and L1 Swedish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 603-620.
  15. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The linguistic proximity model: L2 status as a predictor of L3 development. International Journal of Multilingualism, 9(2), 151-171.
  16. Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2011). L2 influence on L3 acquisition: Does the type of L2 input matter? In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 235-255). John Benjamins.
  17. De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  18. Ringbom, H. (2001). The role of the L2 in L3 learning: The Finnish-Swedish-English triangle. Language Learning, 51(3), 537-567.