The Cognitive Metonymic Motivation of the English “There be” Existential Construction
Abstract
The “There be” existential construction is an iconic English sentence pattern, which establishes a spatial cognitive framework for various nouns through the expletive subject “there” and a focus-final structure. So how is such a construction generated? Based on Grammatical Metonymy Theory, this paper proposes that the cognitive motivation of the English existential construction is the core metonymic operation of PLACE-FOR-EXISTENCE, while abstract nouns additionally require the secondary metonymy ENTITY-FOR-STATE to achieve reification. To validate this model, this study employs a corpus-based approach combined with diachronic analysis and contrastive study to analyze 4,000+ instances of the construction extracted from the COCA, COHA, and OED corpora, which indicates that: (1) Concrete nouns, by virtue of their inherent spatial entity status, predominantly enter the construction directly in non-definite forms; (2) Abstract nouns rely on multiple reification means to achieve “boundedness”; (3) The grammaticalization of “there” is essentially spatial metonymy; (4) A Chinese-English contrast reveals that English adjusts cognitive salience through highly grammaticalized means, whereas Chinese relies more on lexical means and word order to directly present a scene. This study, combining previous research evidence and empirical studies, has firstly proposed a two-tier metonymy model to explain the cognitive motivation of English existential construction.
References
- Li, B., Yang, K., & Wen, X. (2023). A Constructionalization Analysis of the There-Existential Construction and the There-Deictic Construction. Foreign Language Research (Collection), (1), 72-88.
- Li, X., & Liu, Z. G. (2023). A Study on Referentiality Change and the Subjective Meaning of the There-Construction. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 55(2), 189-201, 319.
- Xu, Y. H. (2019). A Study on the Function of the There-Existential Construction in Political Discourse from a Critical Cognitive Perspective (Master’s thesis). Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics.
- Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2009). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. John Benjamins.
- Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Vol. 1). MIT Press.
- Wang, Y. (2019). An Analysis of the There-Be Existential Construction Based on Russell’s Theory of Descriptions: Can 'Existence’ Be a Predicate? Foreign Language Research, (1), 1-6.
- Wei, Z. J. (2021). The Cognitive Metonymic Motivation of Grammatical Constructions: A Case Study of the “Verb-Object + Object” Construction. Foreign Languages in China, 18(3), 24-30.
- Wei, Z. J. (2022). An Embodied-Cognitive Perspective on the Boundedness of English Nouns. Foreign Languages in China, 19(6), 38-43, 51.
- Traugott, E. C. (2004). Exaptation and Grammaticalization. Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.