Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.75> Article
Research Article

Transformation of Mass Aesthetics Involved by Social Media: the Formation and Alienation of Popular Trends

Ran QuanLuxun Academy of Fine Arts*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In the context of the digital age, social media platforms play a significant role in reconstruct mass aesthetics. This paper discusses the transformation pf mass aesthetics involved by social media, with a concentration on formation and alienation of popular trends. Through interaction of users, algorithmic recommendation and capital operation, social media platforms have accelerated the dissemination and rigidity of trends and have deeply reshaped contemporary social aesthetic standards. Aesthetic system dominated by traditional elite class has been broken by technological empowerment, which enabled that average users also gain aesthetic discourse power through content creation and interactive participation. This change has benefited the democratization of aesthetics and diversification of individual expression, but has also led to aesthetic homogenization, symbolization, and commercialization, producing a fast-food style consumerist aesthetic culture. The study further reveals the influence of social media on mass aesthetics is not only reflected in the following blindly of trendy signs and self-objectification but also extended to individual cognition and self-identity level. The rise of short videos and the other sensory-stimulating media have fragmented users’ attention and weakened their capacity to receive aesthetic content in depth. Simultaneously, social media platforms guide users to adjust their self-image to cater to popular trends with industrial aesthetic formula, which has even caused a disconnect between virtual identity and real self, exacerbating identity anxiety and the loss/erosion of aesthetic judgement.

Keywords: social media; mass aesthetics; alienation; identity.
Published: September 24, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.HT27042
Volume: CHR Vol.75
pp. 157-163
Download PDF

References

  1. Habermas, J. (1989). *The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society* (pp. 1–26, 27–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
  2. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2006). *Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications* (pp. 260–280). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  3. Sarwar, B. M., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2001). Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In *Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’01)* (pp. 285–295). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  4. Pazzani, M. J., & Billsus, D. (2007). Content-based recommendation systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), *The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization* (pp. 325–341). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  5. Burke, R. (2002). Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. In *Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2002)* (pp. 69–74). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  6. Covington, P., Adams, J., & Sargin, E. (2016). Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations. In *Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2016)* (pp. 335–342). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  7. van Dijck, J. (2013). *The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media* (pp. 25–40, 70–90). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  8. Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). *The Attention Economy* (pp. 45–46, 52–55). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  9. McLuhan, M. (2003). *Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man* (pp. 7–32, 81–94, 297–320). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Abidin, C. (2018). *Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online* (pp. 45–60). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  11. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). *Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments* (pp. 94–136). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1947)
  12. Benjamin, W. (1968). *The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction* (H. Zohn, Trans., pp. 221–233). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1936)
  13. Marx, K. (1975). *Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844* (H. B. Vermeulen, Trans., pp. 74–85). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  14. Marcuse, H. (1964). *One-Dimensional Man* (pp. 5–7, 11–12, 63–64). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  15. Baudrillard, J. (1998). *The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures* (pp. 25, 38, 50, 94, 99, 145). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
  16. Bauman, Z. (2000). *Liquid Modernity* (pp. 2–6, 18–22). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  17. Giddens, A. (1991). *Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age* (pp. 3–5, 53–54). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.