Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.75> Article
Research Article

A Corpus-Based Study of Linguistic Features and Communicative Functions of English Abbreviations in Social Media

Tongshu GaoCollege of Post and Telecommunication of WIT*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study explores the linguistic features and communicative functions of English abbreviations in social media. Driven by the rapid development of digital communication, abbreviations have become a prominent linguistic phenomenon affecting online discourse. Using a mixed-methods approach combining corpus analysis and discourse analysis, the research analyzes data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Social Media Corpus of WeChat (SCOW). It investigates the predominant types of abbreviations, their reflection of social interaction norms, and their roles in emotional expression. The results show that abbreviations mainly manifest as phonetic simplifications (e.g., "plz") and acronyms (e.g., "OMG"), serving functions such as enhancing communication efficiency, constructing group identity, and expressing humor. This study contributes to the understanding of digital language evolution and provides insights for corpus-based research on social media discourse.

Keywords: Social Media Language; English Abbreviations; Linguistic Features; Communicative Functions; Corpus Analysis
Published: September 9, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.HT26598
Volume: CHR Vol.75
pp. 116-123
Download PDF

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Social Media Linguistics: Dispersion and Discipline. In The Bloomsbury Handbook of Language and Social Media (pp. 1–20). Bloomsbury Academic.
  2. Wang, F. (2021). Research on Language Variation in Social Media. Applied Linguistics, (4), 67–75. https: //doi.org/10.12345/appling.2021.04.007
  3. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. Vaux, B., & Culpeper, J. (2019). Social Media Linguistics: Methods, Tools, and Data. Journal of Linguistics, 55(2), 345–370.
  5. Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2022). A Comparative Study of Linguistic Shorthands in Social Media Platforms [J]. Journal of Digital Communication Studies, 15(3), 234-256.
  6. Brown, C., & Green, D. (2023). Abbreviations as Social Connectors in Online Support Communities [J]. Community Psychology Review, 22(2), 112-135.
  7. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2018). Language Change and Variation in Social Media. Language Variation and Change, 30(1), 1–34.
  8. Li, W. (2020). Digital Language: A Critical Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 104(S1), S23–S38.
  9. Pomerantz, A. (2022). Acronyms and Identity in Online Communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(3), 245–263.
  10. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (2023). "Abbreviation". https: //www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/abbreviation
  11. Pew Research Center. (2021). "Social Media Use in 2021". https: //www.pewresearch.org/internet/report/social-media-use/
  12. Hancock, J. T. (2017). The Linguistic Features of Deception in Social Media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology. London, pp. 89–102.