Research Article

Narrative Deviance and Discursive Discipline: Structural Mechanisms of Audience Resistance to Female-Centric Storytelling

An LiMonash University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study focuses on the structural misinterpretation of the "equal rights grammar" in female-dominated film and television works in the mainstream context, focusing on their expression strategies such as de-romanticized emotional writing, feminine narratives and decentralized male characters, as well as why they are frequently labeled with negative labels such as "overly emotional" and "politically correct" after entering the mainstream vision. Research shows that such misinterpretations are not accidental cognitive biases, but rather a systematic rejection of heterodox narrative forms and the right to gender expression within mainstream reception mechanisms. This article uses three representative female-led works on the Douban platform—Like A Rolling Stone, Her Story, and Barbie—as case studies. The study collected over 600 user reviews (including over 300 highly interactive and over 300 negative ones) and applied qualitative discourse analysis to identify and categorize offensive language directed at the "forms of expression" themselves. The study found that criticism often focuses on the denial of the "legitimacy" of expression rather than substantive disputes over content or subject matter, highlighting the "cognitive exclusion" mechanism inherent in the structure of gender discourse. This study calls for reflection on the boundaries of "effective expression" in the contemporary media context, questioning the gender biases in mainstream narrative evaluation criteria and expressibility, and exposing the structural repression that women's expression still faces in public cultural spaces.

Keywords: Structural Misreading; Equal Rights Grammar; Mainstream Narrative; Female Identity
Published: September 3, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.NE26537
Volume: CHR Vol.82
pp. 87-93
Download PDF

References

  1. Mulvey L. (1975) Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, in Feminist Film Theory: A Reader, Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781474473224-009.
  2. Essig L. (2019) Love, Inc.: dating apps, the big white wedding, and chasing the happily neverafter, University of California Press, Oakland, California. doi: 10.1525/9780520967922.
  3. Ahmed S. (2010) The Promise of Happiness, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
  4. Alsheikh O. (2024) The Evolution of Power Discourses in the Digital Age: A Foucauldian Analysis, Omar Alsheikh, https: //ocheikh.com/the-evolution-of-power-discourses-in-the-digital-age-a-foucauldian-analysis?utm_source=chatgpt.com, accessed 3 August 2025.
  5. Mcrobbie A. (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change, SAGE Publications, London.
  6. BJÖRKLUND J. (2010) Angela McRobbie. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change, Women’s Studies, 39(4): 376–380.
  7. Gill R. (2023) Fear of getting it wrong, in Perfect: feeling judged on social media, Cambridge, pp.145-170
  8. Butler J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge, London.
  9. Baym N.K. (2018) Relational Boundaries, in Playing to the Crowd: Musicians, Audiences, and the Intimate Work of Connection, NYU Press, pp.171-192.
  10. Andrejevic M. (2008) Watching Television Without Pity, Television & New Media, 9(1): 24–46.
  11. Pitcan M., Marwick A.E. and Boyd D. (2018) Performing a Vanilla Self: Respectability Politics, Social Class, and the Digital World, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(3): 163–179.
  12. Her Story short review. (2024) Douban.com, https: //movie.douban.com/subject/36154853/comments?percent_type=h& start=40& limit=20& status=P& sort=new_score.
  13. Like A Rolling Stone short review. (2024) Douban.com, https: //movie.douban.com/subject/36587974/comments?percent_type=l& limit=20& status=P& sort=new_score, accessed 3 August 2025.
  14. Barbie short review. (2023) Douban.com, https: //movie.douban.com/subject/4058939/.