Research Article

Comparative Assessment of Post-Combustion and Pre-Combustion Carbon Capture Technologies

Ziyu LiUniversiti Putra Malaysia*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the growing concern over carbon dioxide emissions in recent years, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, as a highly promising method for mitigating climate change, has received increasing attention, and related research has also been on the rise. This review focuses on a comparative analysis between pre-combustion and post-combustion carbon capture technologies, concerning aspects such as economic costs, carbon dioxide capture efficiency, and deployment applicability. The review first outlines the basic processes involved in the two technologies and compares their operational mechanisms and associated technologies. Then, based on a standardized case study of a 230 MW coal-fired power plant, a further detailed comparison was carried out through simulation and cost analysis to evaluate CO₂ capture efficiency, total captured volume, and related costs. The analysis shows that while post-combustion offers slightly higher capture efficiency, pre-combustion has significant advantages in energy conservation and cost-effectiveness under high-pressure conditions. Moreover, post-combustion systems are better suited for retrofitting existing power plants because of their simpler design, whereas pre-combustion systems are more appropriate for new installations. The review concludes that both of these carbon capture technologies are viable, mainly depending on specific project requirements and infrastructure environment. This review provides a certain reference value for policymakers and engineers on how to select the suitable carbon capture technology, and highlights the significance of integrating technical, economic, and environmental factors during the deployment of CCS technology.

Keywords: carbon emission; carbon capture and storage; sustainable energy engineering; climate change mitigation technologies
Published: August 20, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.LC26145
Volume: CHR Vol.74
pp. 198-210
Download PDF

References

  1. Vaziri, P., Rasaei, M. R., Seyfoori, S., Zamani, S., Mahmoodi, M. and Sedaee, B. (2024) Advancing carbon capture technologies in CCS: A comprehensive review of pre-combustion processes. Gas Science and Engineering, 205481.
  2. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2025). Global energy review 2025: CO₂ emissions. Retrieved from https: //www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/co2-emissions
  3. Mostafaeipour, A., Bidokhti, A., Fakhrzad, M. B., Sadegheih, A. and Mehrjerdi, Y. Z. (2022) A new model for the use of renewable electricity to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Energy, 238, 121602.
  4. Yadav, S. and Mondal, S. S. (2022) A review on the progress and prospects of oxy-fuel carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. Fuel, 308, 122057.
  5. Chen, Z. (2022) A review of pre-combustion carbon capture technology. In 2022 7th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2022) (pp. 524–528). Atlantis Press.
  6. Akeeb, O., Wang, L., Xie, W., Davis, R., Alkasrawi, M. and Toan, S. (2022) Post-combustion CO₂ capture via a variety of temperature ranges and material adsorption process: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 313, 115026.
  7. Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J. and Fan, X. (2021) Post-combustion carbon capture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110490.
  8. Dubey, A. and Arora, A. (2022) Advancements in carbon capture technologies: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133932.
  9. Babcock and Wilcox. (2023) Post-combustion CO₂ scrubbing. Retrieved from https: //www.babcock.com/home/environmental/decarbonization/post-combustion-co2-scrubbing
  10. Damartzis, T., Asimakopoulou, A., Koutsonikolas, D., Skevis, G., Georgopoulou, C., Dimopoulos, G., Nikolopoulos, L., Bougiouris, K., Richter, H., Lubenau, U., Economopoulos, S., Perinu, C., Hopkinson, D. and Panagakos, G. (2022) Solvents for membrane-based post-combustion CO₂ capture for potential application in the marine environment. Applied sciences, 12(12), 6100.
  11. Obi, D., Onyekuru, S. and Orga, A. (2025) Minimizing carbon capture costs in power plants: A novel dimensional analysis framework for techno-economic evaluation of oxyfuel combustion, pre-combustion, and post-combustion capture systems. Energy Science & Engineering.
  12. Kheirinik, M., Ahmed, S. and Rahmanian, N. (2021) Comparative techno-economic analysis of carbon capture processes: Pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion operations. Sustainability, 13(24), 13567.
  13. U.S. Department of Energy. (n.d.) Precombustion carbon capture research. Retrieved from https: //www.energy.gov/fecm/pre-combustion-carbon-capture-research
  14. Gkotsis, P., Peleka, E. and Zouboulis, A. (2023) Membrane-based technologies for post-combustion CO₂ capture from flue gases: Recent progress in commonly employed membrane materials. Membranes, 13(12), 898.
  15. Saxena, A., Prakash Gupta, J., Tiwary, J. K., Kumar, A., Sharma, S., Pandey, G., Biswas, S. and Raghav Chaturvedi, K. (2024) Innovative pathways in carbon capture: Advancements and strategic approaches for effective carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Sustainability, 16(22), 10132.