Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.73> Article
Research Article

China-Australia Geopolitical Game and the Transformation of Diplomatic Strategy in the Era of Economic Globalisation 3.0

Zhanrui LiuWuhan University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study carries out a systematic analysis on the process of evolution of geopolitical rivalry and diplomatic strategies between China and Australia during the 3rd stage of economic globalization. The study finds that China-Australia relations have evolved into a complex landscape characterised by a transition from economic complementarity to a coexistence of strategic competition and cooperation. Australia's relations with China are shaped by three main aspects: multilevel strategic concerns about China's rise, structural constraints due to the Australia-US alliance; and home-grown political forces shaping its relations with China. From the research, it is observed that new changes in economic globalization 3.0 like reorganization of global value chain, and growth of digital economy are having an immense impact on the interaction pattern between China and Australia. This article proposed policy suggestions on how to advance healthy Sino- Australian relations from three parts,which are strategic communication between China and Australia, Economic and Trade cooperation, People-to-People relationships. Also put forward some future research areas, like digital economy cooperation and economic and trade cooperation under RCEP framework etc. According to this study, it seems that if China and Australia can properly deal with their differences and innovate how they cooperate, they will be able to establish a more stable and mature bilateral relationship.

Keywords: China-Australia relations; Economic globalisation; geopolitical competition; Diplomatic strategy
Published: July 11, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.24852
Volume: CHR Vol.73
pp. 18-23
Download PDF

References

  1. Han. (2022). New changes in geopolitical competition among major powers: the cases of hybrid warfare and the gray zone. Teaching and Research, 56(2), 71-82.
  2. Sansika Nadeena, Sandumini Raveesha, Kariyawasam Chamathka, Bandara Tharushi, Wisenthige Krishantha & Jayathilaka Ruwan. (2023). Impact of economic globalisation on value-added agriculture, globally. . PloS one, 18(7), e0289128-e0289128.
  3. Naoise McDonagh & Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann. (2025). Economic Coercion and Grey Zone Competition: Reassessing the China-Australia Case. Pacific Affairs, 98 (1), 53-77.
  4. Izotov Vladimir S. & Obydenkova Anastassia V. (2021). Geopolitical games in Eurasian regionalism: ideational interactions and regional international organisations. Post-Communist Economies, 33 (2-3), 150-174.
  5. Stewart Firth. (2020). Australia in International Politics: An introduction to Australian foreign policy. doi:10. 4324/9781003114918.
  6. Centre for Business History Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School Frederiksberg Denmark, Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California Los Angeles California & Eberhardt School of Business University of the Pacific Los Angeles California. (2020). Geopolitical jockeying: Economic nationalism and multinational strategy in historical perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 41 (3), 400-421.
  7. Corridors of Power; Envoy Nebenzya: Russia concerned by OPCW becoming geopolitical game tool [J]. Interfax : Russia & CIS Military Daily.