Research Article

AI+XR Technology-Driven Research on the Digital Communication Effects of Cultural Heritage

Jiaying WangSchool of Management, Anhui University, Hefei, China* Changchang LiuSchool of Management, Anhui University, Hefei, China

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper takes the “Eternal Splendor of the Tang Dynasty” immersive exhibition at the Anhui Museum as a practical case to explore the digital communication effects of AI+XR technology in museum displays. By integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and User Experience Theory, the study constructs a research model around three dimensions: technological implementation, content innovation, and user experience. The study reveals a chain mechanism of digital cultural communication, encompassing “digital experience - emotional experience - acceptance - revisit intention.” Empirical analysis based on 436 valid questionnaires shows that aesthetic experience, interactive experience, immersive experience, cultural content experience, and cultural value experience all have a significant positive impact on emotional experience. Emotional experience significantly positively influences acceptance, which in turn significantly positively affects revisit intention. The user clustering analysis based on the K-means algorithm identifies three types of groups: basic, conservative, and deep experience types. This research provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for the digital transformation of museums in the era of artificial intelligence.

Keywords: Digital communication; Cultural heritage revitalization; AI+XR technology; Technology acceptance model; User experience theory
Published: May 19, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.23042
Volume: CHR Vol.60
pp. 161-168
Download PDF

References

  1. Jiao, B. (2021). Application of panoramic technology in museum exhibitions: A case study of Gongyi Museum. Industrial Innovation Research, 20, 43-45.
  2. Liu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2024). Immersive communication and poetic narration: Digital exhibitions empowered by XR technology. Science and Technology Communication, 16(20), 11-15.
  3. Norman, D. A. (2005). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  5. Green, W. S., & Jordan, P. V. (2002). Pleasure with products, beyond usability. In P. M. Desmet & P. P. M. Hekkert (Eds.), The basis of product emotions (pp. 58-68). Taylor & Francis.
  6. Huang, S. (2012). Research on app design based on user experience (Master’s thesis). Shaanxi University of Science and Technology.
  7. Blumenthal, V. (2020). Consumer immersion in managed visitor attractions: The role of individual responses and antecedent factors. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 20(1), 4-27.
  8. Ding, J. H., Zhang, Q., Guo, C. Y., et al. (2014). Cognitive psychology. China Renmin University Press.
  9. Schwartz, S. H. (2015). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. Oxford University Press.
  10. Xia, J. J., Li, Y. X., & Zhang, D. Y. (2019). Digital reconstruction of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of user experience: A case study of the “Jinqiao wind and percussion” experience design. Sichuan Drama, 11, 108-112.
  11. Wang, Y. Q., & Guo, J. M. (2021). Empirical study on the impact of the spread of classic red-themed songs on college students in the new era. Audiovisual Theory and Practice, 04, 75-86.
  12. Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224.