#InfantFood: Women's Subtle Resistance under the Algorithmic Gaze of Rednote Users
Abstract
Although Rednote's user demographic is mostly female (70-80%), numerous individuals claim to encounter harassment from male users. In this environment, female users construct a sophisticated coping technique that has not been adequately studied. This study investigates the phenomenon of female users’ intentional appropriation of the hashtag #InfantFood on Rednote to minimize the visibility of their posts to male users. Based on the theory of algorithmic bias, the study endeavors to solve the central questions: why do female users choose the specific hashtag #InfantFood? How does it achieve dual resistance against traditional gender discipline and algorithmic bias? The current study proposes that female users' appropriation of #InfantFood serves as a subtle form of resistance to subvert the algorithmic bias and gender discipline embedded in #InfantFood, rendering a safe space where women are empowered to have a voice, while the practice also raises concern about gender segregation and the formation of echo chambers, which may exacerbate misunderstandings and conflicts between genders. This paper offers a novel perspective on the interplay between algorithmic bias, gender discrimination, and online harassment and offers insights for a reevaluation of algorithmic design to promote gender equality in digital spaces.
References
- Chen, Qunfeng, and Zhou Enhui. “Antitrust Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination in Digital Age.” Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, no. 3, 2023, pp. 207-219.
- Yang, Guanchun, and Lu Xianghua. “Technical and Management Design Innovation for Promoting Adhesiveness of Users in Virtual Communities - An Empirical Study.” R&D Management, vol. 21, no. 5, 2009, pp. 29–38.
- Wen, Fengming, and Xuefang Xie. “The Operational Logic and Ethical Concerns of Short Video Recommendation Algorithms: A Perspective from Actor-Network Theory.” Journal of Southwest Minzu University.vol. 43, no. 2, 2022, pp. 160–169.
- Li, Dan. “Algorithmic Discrimination against Consumers: Behavior Mechanism, Profit and Loss Definition, and Compound Regulation.” Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, no.6, 2021, pp.17-33.
- Yin, Qingxia, and Karmilah B. B. Abdullah. “Analysis of Gender Discourse Bias and Gender Discrimination in Social Media: A Case Study of the TikTok Platform.” Journal of Intercultural Communication, vol. 24, no. 2, 2024, pp. 93-102.
- Phipps, Catherine. “‘You Belong in the Kitchen’: Social Media, Virtual Manhood Acts, and Women Strength Sport Athletes' Experiences of Gender-Based Violence Online.” Feminist Media Studies, vol. 23, no. 8, 2023, pp. 4221-4237.
- Clark, Rosemary. “Hope in a Hashtag: The Discursive Activism of #WhyIStayed.”Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 5, 2016, pp. 788-804.
- Feng, Jianxia. “#SeeWomenWorkers: Female Self-Media and Discursive Activism During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Xinwen Jizhe [Journalist], no. 10, 2020, pp. 32–44.
- Wajcman, Judy. "Feminist Theories of Technology." Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 2010, pp. 143-152.
- Rahmatullah, Mohammad and Tanu Gupta. "Disrupting the Binary: An Argument for Cybernetic Feminism in Deconstructing AI’s Gendered Algorithms." Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023.
- Zhang, Xin and Song, Yuxin. “Algorithmic Gaze on Women: Gendered Ethics and Governance Framework for Deepfakes.” Journal of Women's Studies, no.6, 2024, pp.81-94.
- Hall, Stuart, and David Morley. Essential Essays. Duke University Press , 2019.
- Sunstein, Cass R. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford University Press, 2009.
- Sunstein, Cass R. Republic.com. Princeton University Press, 2007.