Research Article

The Natural Philosophy of Northern Song Landscape Painting: A Case Study of Early Spring and Travelers among Mountains and Streams

Xiangyun FuThe Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The Northern Song Dynasty, marked by political stability and economic prosperity, fostered a vibrant cultural atmosphere under its policy of “prioritizing literature over military power.” As Neo-Confucianism emerged in this period, traditional philosophical thoughts like Taoism and Confucianism blended with each other, deeply influencing the concepts and styles of artistic creation. As classic works of Northern Song landscape paintings, Early Spring and Travelers among Mountains and Streams show the breathtaking natural scenery with superb skills and artistic conception. While previous studies on famous paintings have mostly focused on the technical aspects of art, this paper selects these two paintings as research objects, integrating art history research, visual analysis, and philosophical thinking to study the similarities and differences in philosophical ideas of the two paintings. Through comparative analysis, this paper reveals that the common point of these two paintings is that they express the concept of “unity of heaven and man” expressed by the two paintings, as well as their unique natural orders and worldviews. Early Spring showcases the flexibility, cyclicity, and vitality of nature, while Travelers among Mountains and Streams conveys a sense of stability, eternity, and awe.

Keywords: Northern Song Dynasty; Landscape Painting; Early Spring; Travelers among Mountains and Streams; Natural philosophy
Published: May 15, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.22849
Volume: CHR Vol.60
pp. 122-127
Download PDF

References

  1. Ji, Haoran. (2021). The evolution of brushwork in Song Dynasty landscape painting. Journal of Weinan Normal University, (04), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.15924/j.cnki.1009-5128.2021.04.013
  2. Liang, Yan. (2018). The aesthetic evolution of landscape painting composition in the Five Dynasties and the Two Song Dynasties. Panorama of Chinese Nationalities, (09), 181-182.
  3. Yu, H.C. (2021). The Influence of Confucianism and Daoism on the Changes of Chinese Painting Theories. From Figure Painting to Landscape (shanshui) Painting. Synthesis philosophica, 36(2), 257-276.
  4. Quan, Sisi. (2020). An Analysis of the Discourse Composition of "Li" in Guo Xi's Early Spring. Art Education Research, (08), 10-11.
  5. Qi, Z. (2024). The Spirit of Traditional Chinese Aesthetics. Springer Nature Singapore.
  6. Hay, J., Mair, V. H., Bush, S., & Shih, H. -Y. (2017). Guo Xi (Attrib.), “Advice on Landscape.” In Guo Xi (Attrib.), Advice on Landscape, University of Hawaii Press, 381.
  7. Chai, D. (2021). Guo Xi on Painting the Invisible Gaze of the Dao. Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture, 8(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1215/23290048-9299645
  8. Shen, Yadan. (2024). How Can One Wander in the Landscape? On the Substantive Dao in Landscape Painting and Its Transcendence. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (02), 10-20.
  9. National Palace Museum, Taipei https://www.npm.gov.tw/
  10. Xu, Li. (2023). Analyzing the Zhongzheng Spirit of Northern Song Literati from the "Central Peak Standing Prominently" in Fan Kuan's Paintings. Art Education Research, (03), 10-12.
  11. Turner, M. (2009). Classical Chinese landscape painting and the aesthetic appreciation of nature. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 43(1), 106-121.
  12. Huang, Xiaofeng. (2021). New Eyes on Old Pictures: How to Look at Chinese Painting. Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House, 199-121.
  13. Diep, V. T. (2016). The landscape of the Void: truth and magic in Chinese landscape painting. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 16(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2016.1245489
  14. Jiao, H. (2025). A Multi-Dimensional Interpretation of the View of Nature and Humanistic Spirit in Chinese Landscape Paintings from the Perspective of Art Criticism. Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 22(2), 524-544.