Symbol, History, and Destiny: Narrative Coherence in Victor Hugo's Les Misérables Through Segmented Discourse Representation Theory
Abstract
This paper applies Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT), as proposed by Asher and Lascarides in 2003, to analyze the discourse structure of Victor Hugo's Les Misérables, focusing on how Hugo intertwines historical commentary with narrative structure to shape character fates and plot development. Centering on the events of the June 5, 1832 revolt, this study conducts both global and micro analyses, exploring the structural and rhetorical mechanisms that situate these narrative elements within broader historical currents.Furthermore, the paper critically engages with the challenges posed by SDRT's Right Frontier Constraint (RFC), demonstrating that Hugo’s non-linear, symbolic narrative layers complicate traditional discourse coherence models. By incorporating Reader-Response Theory, this study highlights how Hugo’s narrative strategies invite active reader engagement, transforming structural ambiguities into deliberate rhetorical devices. Ultimately, this interdisciplinary approach not only enhances the understanding of Hugo’s sophisticated literary technique—integrating personal destinies with historical inevitability—but also underscores SDRT’s valuable analytical potential in literary discourse studies.
References
- Hugo, V. (1987). Les Misérables (N. Denny, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1862).
- Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
- Asher, N. (2017). The Logical Foundations of Discourse Interpretation. In Logic Colloquium'96: Proceedings of the Colloquium held in San Sebastián, Spain, July 9–15, 1996 (Vol. 12, p. 1). Cambridge University Press.
- Danlos, L., & Hankach, P. (2008). Right frontier constraint for discourses in non canonical order. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (CID'2008).
- Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.
- Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. Word, 62(1), 35-58.
- Rubtcova, M., Pavenkov, O., Khmyrova-Pruel, I., Malinina, T., & Dadianova, I. (2016). Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as sociolinguistic and sociological conception: Possibilities and limits of theoretical framework.
- Muhsinovna, R. M., & Aminovich, U. A. (2022). The Implementation of Corpus-based Techniques to Analyze Literary Works. Open Access Repository, 8(04), 88-91.
- Biber, D. (1990). Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and linguistic computing, 5(4), 257-269.
- Widdowson, H. G. (1995). Discourse analysis: a critical view. Language and literature, 4(3), 157-172.
- Baxter, J. (2010). Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk. Research methods in linguistics, 117-137.
- Lascarides, A., & Asher, N. (2007). Segmented discourse representation theory: Dynamic semantics with discourse structure. In Computing meaning (pp. 87-124). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- Schilder, F. (1998). An underspecified segmented discourse representation theory (USDRT). In 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Volume 2 (pp. 1188-1192)
- Vieu, L. (2007). On blocking: The rhetorical aspects of content-level discourse relations and their semantics. Aurnague, M., Korta, K. et Larrazabal, JM (eds) Language, Representation and Reasoning. Memorial Volume to Isabel Gómez-Txurruka, 263-282.