Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.66> Article
Research Article

Miscue Analysis as a Diagnostic Tool: Exploring English Reading Challenges among Chinese Middle School Students

Jianing LiCollege of English, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the increasing importance of English, Chinese middle school students face significant challenges in developing English proficiency. This study explores the English reading abilities of Chinese middle school students through the innovative method of miscue analysis, which examines the deviations from the expected response during the reading process to reveal their underlying reading strategies and shortcomings. Pioneered by Ken Goodman, miscue analysis has provided valuable insights into reading behaviors across diverse populations. This research involves 40 junior high school students from Tianjin Foreign Language School, analyzing the types and causes of miscues in their reading process. The findings indicate that these students mainly face challenges such as having a limited vocabulary, making grammatical errors and experiencing comprehension difficulties. The result emphasizes the potential of miscue analysis as a diagnostic tool in second-language education, offering educators a deeper understanding of students’ reading processes, guiding the development of targeted interventions to enhance the quality of second-language education. Future research should focus on expanding the sample size, developing specific scientific interventions to increase credibility, and applying miscue analysis to broader student populations and contexts to provide a comprehensive understanding of factors influencing English language learning in China.

Keywords: English learning; miscue analysis; education; TESOL
Published: May 6, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.22476
Volume: CHR Vol.66
pp. 21-26
Download PDF

References

  1. Krashen, S. Bridging inequity with books [J]. Educational Leadership, 1998, 55(4): 18-22.
  2. McQuillan, J. The literacy crisis: False claims, real solutions [M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1998.
  3. Neuman, S. B. Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy [J]. Reading Research Quarterly, 1999, 34: 286-311.
  4. Neuman, S. B. , Celano, D. Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods [J]. Reading Research Quarterly , 2001, 36: 8-26.
  5. Brown, J. , Goodman, K. , Marek, A. Studies in miscue analysis: An annotated bibliography [M]. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1996.
  6. Goodman, K. S. Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics [J]. Reading Research Quarterly , 1969, 5(1): 9.
  7. Goodman, Y. M. Reading miscue inventory: From evaluation to instruction [M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2005.
  8. Goodman, K. S, Goodman, Y. M. Making sense of learners making sense of written language: The selected works of Kenneth S. Goodman and Yetta M. Goodman [M]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
  9. Coll, C. , Osuna, M. Dialect barriers to reading comprehension re visited. In: Journal of Reading , 1990, 33(6): 464-470.
  10. Goodman, K. S. , Fries, P. H. , Strauss, S. L. Reading-the grand illusion: How and why people make sense of print [M]. New York: Routledge, 2012.
  11. Mikulec, A. Reading in two languages: A comparative miscue analysis [J]. Language and Literacy, 2015, 17(1): 1-15.
  12. Wurr, A. J. , Theurer, J. L. , Kim, K. J. Retrospective miscue analysis with proficient adult ESL readers [J]. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 2008, 52(4): 324-333.
  13. Goodman, Y. M. Miscue analysis for classroom teachers: Some history and some procedures [J]. Primary Voices K , 1987, 3(4): 2-9.
  14. Goodman, Y. M. , Watson, D. J. , Burke, C. L. Reading miscue inventory: Alternative procedures [M]. New York: Richard C. Owen Publishers, 1987.