The Application of International Treaties in the Repatriation of Chinese Cultural Relics
Abstract
The loss of Chinese cultural relics due to war plundering, colonial expropriation, and illegal trade has resulted in millions of artifacts being scattered across the globe. In response, China has actively engaged in cultural heritage protection through international treaties, including the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, the Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects. However, the effectiveness of these treaties in repatriating lost artifacts remains limited due to temporal constraints (non-retroactivity), spatial fragmentation (asymmetry in treaty ratification), and judicial barriers (cross-border litigation challenges). The non-retroactivity principle prevents the restitution of relics lost before treaty adoption, while disparities in treaty participation among market and source countries hinder enforcement. Additionally, procedural obstacles in litigation, such as conflicts of laws and recognition of foreign judgments, further restrict legal avenues for restitution. To address these issues, this paper proposes enhancing treaty applicability, strengthening international enforcement mechanisms, and promoting a unified global legal framework to improve the effectiveness of cultural relic restitution under international law.
References
- Li Yuche, Chen Qian. Cultural Relics Restitution Requires Greater Cooperation [N]. Global Times, April 2 2, 2024 (013). DOI: 10.28378/n.cnki.nhqsb.2024.002438.
- See 1995 Convention Contracting States, available at: <https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/cultural-property /1995-convention/status/> (accessed March 4, 2025).
- See Evelien Campfens,“Whose Cultural Objects? Introducing Heritage Title for Cross-Border Cultural Property Claims,” 67 Netherlands International Law Review 257 (2020).
- Fan Tianzhen. The Repatriation of Lost Cultural Relics from an International Law Perspective [D]. China Foreign Affairs University, 2012.
- Huo Zhengxin, Chen Ruida. Jurisprudential Reflections on the Repatriation of Lost Cultural Relics from the Perspective of Cultural Sovereignty: An Analysis Based on Lost Artifacts from Grotto Temples [J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(01): 112-126. DOI: 10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.000346.