Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.2> Article
Research Article

Commoda Romani Populi and the Practice of Late Roman Politics

Fucheng ZhangDepartment of Greek and Latin,University College London, London, UK*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Commoda Romani Populi(public interest) played a prominent role in the political practice in Republican Rome. This preliminary study aims to provide an overview of the role of Commoda Romani Populi in Roman political culture and its political performance. The latest scholarships have shown that the Roman people played a far more critical role in politics than previous scholars thought. Thus it is necessary to reinterpret the role of the Roman people in politics. This essay adopts the theories of Almond and Verba to claim that the majority of Roman people in Rome was not simply politically passive at all time. When political elites have severe lapses in promoting the public interest, their level of political engagement can be dramatically be motivated that finally forces political elites to consider public opinion and hold their behaviours responsible. Moreover, this essay also offers a brief examination of how Commoda Romani Populi was perceived, reinterpreted and manipulated when there was a strong disagreement between political elites and Roman people during the late Roman Republic. Finally, this study argues that the Commoda Romani Populi has a real cultural and practical influence on public affairs instead of being an empty slogan.

Keywords: Roman politics; Commoda Romani Populi; Public interest
Published: February 28, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2/2022317
Volume: CHR Vol.2
pp. 47-59
Download PDF

References

  1. Almond, G. A., Verba, S., Almond, G. A. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Germany
  2. Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge
  3. (2016) “Popular sovereignty in the late Roman Republic: Cicero and the will of the people,” in Bourke, R. and Skinner, Q. (eds) Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge
  4. Astin, A. E.(1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford
  5. Atkins, J.W.(2013). Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason, Cambridge
  6. --(2018). Roman Political Thought, Cambridge
  7. Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds) (2011) Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge
  8. --(2016). Money and Power in the Roman Republic. Belgium
  9. Boatwright, M. T(2012). Peoples of the Roman World. Cambridge
  10. Broughton.T. R. S. (1991). Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections: Some Ancient Roman "Also-Rans". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 81(4), I-64.
  11. Brunt. P. A, (1988). The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford
  12. Cartledge, P. (2016). Democracy: A Life. Oxford
  13. David, J,(2006). ‘Rhetoric and Public Life’ in N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx.A ed. Companion to the Roman Republic, Oxford: 421-438
  14. Dighton. A. (2017). Mutatio Vestis: Clothing and Political Protest in the Late Roman Republic. Phoenix, 71(3/4), 345-369.
  15. Dyck, A.R, (1998). A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis, Ann Arbor
  16. --(2004). A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus, Ann Arbor
  17. Erdkamp. P,(2013). The food supply of the capital, in Erdkamp, P(ed). The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rome
  18. Finley, M. I, (1983). Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge
  19. Garnsey, P. (1988). Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis. Cambridge
  20. Gelzer, M.(1969). The Roman Nobility. Oxford
  21. Gruen, E. S. (1968). Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C. Cambridge
  22. --(1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley Flower, H. I.(2010). Roman Republics. Princeton.
  23. Haimson Lushkov, A. (2015) Magistracy and the Historiography of the Roman Republic: Politics in Prose. Cambridge
  24. Hölkeskamp, K.J.(2000). ’The Roman Republic: Government of the People, by the People, for the People?’, SCI 19: 203-23
  25. --(2010). Reconstructing the Roman Republic. An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton.
  26. --(2020). Roman Republican Reflections: Studies in Politics, Power, and Pageantry, Stuttgart
  27. Hopkins, K. (1983). Death and Renewal. Cambridge.
  28. Jehne, M.(1995). Demokratie in Rom? die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik.F. Steiner
  29. --(2006). ‘Methods, models and historiography’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx. Oxford: 3–28.
  30. --(2011). ‘Blaming the people in front of the people. Restraint and outbursts of orators in Roman contiones’, in C. Smith and R. Corvino. Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetori. Swansea: 111–25.
  31. —(2013) Feeding the Plebs with Words: The Significance of Senatorial Public Oratory in the Small World of Roman Politics in Steel & Der Blom(eds) Community and Communication Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. 49-62
  32. Lintott, A. W(1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.
  33. --(2008). Cicero as Evidence: A Historian's Companion. Oxford
  34. Logghe, L, (2017). Plebeian Agency in the Later Roman Republic, in Evans(Ed). Mass and Elite in the Greek and Roman World, 63-81
  35. Lushkov, A. H. (2015) Magistracy and the Historiography of the Roman Republic: Politics in Prose. Cambridge
  36. --(2018) “Private Knowledge and Public Image in Roman Elections: The Case of the Pro Murena,” in van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds) Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge
  37. Morstein-Marx, R.(2004). Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
  38. --(2011) “Consular appeals to the army in 88 and 87: the locus of legitimacy in late-republican Rome,” in Beck, H., Duplá, A., Jehne, M., and Pina Polo, F. (eds) Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge
  39. --(2013). ‘“Cultural hegemony” and the communicative power of the Roman elite’, in Community and Communication. Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, ed. C. Steel and H. Van der Blom. Oxford: 29–47.
  40. — (2019) Fear of the People. RSI 131: 515-533
  41. — (2021). Julius Caesar and the Roman People. Cambridge
  42. Mouritsen, H.(2001). Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge
  43. --(2005) ‘Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic R. Morstein-Marx’, The Journal of Roman Studies, 95, pp. 251–252
  44. --(2017). Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge
  45. Nicolet, C. (1980). The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome. London.
  46. Nippel, W. (1995). Public order in ancient Rome. Cambridge
  47. North, J. A. (1990). ‘Politics and Aristocracy in the Roman Republic’, P&P 126: 3–21
  48. --(2007). ‘The constitution of the Roman Republic’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx. Oxford: 256–77
  49. Patterson, J. R. (2006) The City of Rome. in N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx.A ed. Companion to the Roman Republic, Oxford: 345-364
  50. Paul.G. M.(1984). A Historical Commentary on Sallust’s Bellum Jugurthinum. Liverpool
  51. Pina Polo, F. (2011). The Consuls at Rome. The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
  52. --(2021) “Rhetoric, Oratory and People in Ancient Rome and Early China,” in Beck, H. and Vankeerberghen, G. (eds) Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–155
  53. Robb. M.A,(2010). Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic.Stuttgart
  54. Rosenstein, N.(2006). ‘Aristocratic Values’, in N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx, A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford: 365–382.
  55. Rosillo-López, C. (2017) Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge
  56. -(2016). Cash Is King: the Monetization of Politics in the Late Republic. In Beck, Hans(Ed). Money and Power in the Roman Republic. 26-36
  57. --(Eds.). (2017). Political Communication in the Roman World. Leiden
  58. --(2018) “Political Participation and the Identification of Politicians in the Late Roman Republic,” in van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds) Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge
  59. --(Eds). (2019). Communicating Public Opinion in the Roman Republic.Stuttgart.
  60. Schofield, M,(1995) Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica, in Powell, Cicero the Philosopher: 12 Papers, 63-83
  61. -- (2021). Cicero: Political Philosophy, Oxford.
  62. Seager, R. (2013). ‘Polybius’ distortions of the Roman constitution: a simplistic explanation’, in B. Gibson and T. Harrison. Polybius and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank, Oxford: 247–54.
  63. Steel, C. (2013). The End of the Roman Republic, 146–44 BC. Conquest and Crisis. Edinburgh
  64. Straumann, B. (2016). Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution.
  65. Syme, R. (1939). The Roman Revolution. Oxford.
  66. Taylor, L. R. (1949). Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley.
  67. --(1966). Roman voting assemblies: from the Hannibalic War to the dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor
  68. Tatun, W.J.(2009). Roman Democracy?, in K. Balot. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought . Oxford: 214-227
  69. Van der Blom, H.D.(2016). Oratory and Political Career in the Roman Republic. Cambridge
  70. --(2013). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome.Oxford
  71. Van der Blom, H., Gray, C. and Steel, C. (eds) (2018) Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge
  72. Veyne, P (1990). Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. Lane Walbank, F. W. (1972). Polybius. Berkeley.
  73. Wood, N. (1988). Cicero's social and political thought. Berkeley
  74. Yakobson, A. 1(1999). Elections and Electioneering in Rome. Historia Einzelschriften 128. Stuttgart
  75. --(2006). ‘Popular Power in the Roman Republic’, in N. Rosenstein and R. Morstein-Marx, A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford: 383-400
  76. --(2010). ‘Traditional political culture and the people’s role in the Roman Republic’, Historia 59: 282–302.
  77. —(2013) Cultural Hegemony and the Communicative Power of the Roman Elites in Steel & Der Blom(Eds), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford. 29-48
  78. --(2017). Consuls consulars aristocratic competition and the people's judgement: Consuls, Consulars, Aristocratic Competition and the People's Judgment”, in Ann-Cathrin Harders and Matthias Haake (Eds.), Politische Kultur Und Soziale Struktur Der Römischen Republik, Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2017, 497 – 516.
  79. --(2018) “Aristocratic Dignity and Indignity in Republican Public Life,” in van der Blom, H., Gray, C., and Steel, C. (eds) Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–34