Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.55> Article
Research Article

Cross-cultural Collision: Romeo and Juliet vs. Classical Chinese Concept of Love

CHAO CHENG IEOKDepartment of Chinese Language and Literature, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 528499, China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines the contrasting concepts of love in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet and Classical Chinese thought. Through comparative analysis, it highlights how cultural contexts shape understandings of love. In Romeo and Juliet, love is depicted as intense and fervent, driving the protagonists to the brink of self-destruction and prioritizing personal emotion over societal norms. This individualistic portrayal emphasizes impulsiveness and selflessness. In contrast, the Classical Chinese view of love often focuses on familial relationships and social responsibilities, advocating a balance between personal desires and communal obligations. Despite these differences, Shakespeare's depiction of love offers a new perspective that can enrich the Classical Chinese understanding of emotional expression. This study not only explores the nuances of love in different cultural frameworks but also suggests that Shakespearean themes can provide valuable insights for enhancing Classical Chinese love narratives. Ultimately, this research serves as a foundational reference for further explorations of cross-cultural love concepts, encouraging deeper understanding and communication between diverse literary traditions. Future studies should expand upon this theme by examining additional works and perspectives to foster greater intercultural dialogue.

Keywords: love literature; Cultural differences; comparative literature
Published: March 7, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.21311
Volume: CHR Vol.55
pp. 80-88
Download PDF

References

  1. Dong Bin. Comparative Study of Wall Cultural Prototype in The Romance of the Western Chamber and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Social Sciences Review, 2000, (04): 79-80. DOI: 10.16745/j.cnki.cn62-1110/c.2000.04.036
  2. Fan Wenbin. A Comparative Reading of The Romance of the Western Chamber and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Journal of Shanxi Coal Management Cadre Institute, 2002, (04): 65-67.
  3. Gou Yan. Perceiving Cultural Differences between China and the West through Drama: A Case Study of The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Today's Culture and Creation, 2021, (31): 42-43. DOI: 10.20024/j.cnki.cn42-1911/i.2021.31.016
  4. Guo Cui. A Comparative Analysis of The Story of the Eastern Brocade and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Young Writers, 2012, (08): 207-208.
  5. Hai Jinxia. A Comparative Study of The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Journal of Henan Mechanical and Electrical Engineering College, 2003, (02): 94-95.
  6. Hastuti D.E. AN ANALYSIS ON SUBTITLING STRATEGIES OF ROMEO AND JULIET MOVIE [J]. Register Journal, 2015, 8 (1): 57-80.
  7. He Yahong. An Adaptation Study of Errenzhuan Scripts from the Perspective of Implied Reader: Taking Romeo and Juliet as an Example [J]. Drama Literature, 2022, (01): 94-99. DOI: 10.14043/j.cnki.xjwx.2022.01.007
  8. J.N.W. Romeo and Juliet (Review) [J]. Shakespeare Bulletin, 2022, 39 (4): 713-717.
  9. Kathryn C. Sepulchral Sensuality and Heretical Heavens in Wuthering Heights and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Brontë Studies, 2021, 46 (4): 382-394.
  10. Lu Lichun. A Comparative Study on the Literariness of The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Drama Literature, 2022, (10): 84-90. DOI: 10.14043/j.cnki.xjwx.2022.10.002
  11. Qiao Hui. On the Dramatic Conflicts in The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Jianan Literature(Classic Academy), 2012, (08): 160.
  12. Shenton M. Romeo and Juliet [J]. The Stage, 2016, (22): 15.
  13. Though Same in Shape, Rose and Jasmine Differ in Fragrance — On the Different Ideological Meanings of The Peacock Flies Southeast, The Butterfly Lovers, Romeo and Juliet, and Intrigue and Love [J]. Journal of Northwest Nationalities University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 1997, (04): 105-112.
  14. Xie Shijian, He Qinghong. A Comparative Study of the Conceptual Metaphor of "Love" in The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Journal of Fuyang Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (04): 39-44. DOI: 10.14096/j.cnki.cn34-1333/c.2021.04.07
  15. Yan Caixia. Eastern Masterpiece, Western Myth — A Comparison between Romeo and Juliet and The Butterfly Lovers [J]. Examination Weekly, 2008, (24): 207-208.
  16. Yan Haoran. A Cognitive Stylistic Analysis of The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet Based on Conceptual Integration [D]. Beijing Foreign Studies University, 2021. DOI: 10.26962/d.cnki.gbjwu.2021.001058
  17. Zdriluk H. 'Facebooked: Romeo and Juliet' as Educational Theatre: An Improbable Fiction? [J]. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 2016, 21 (3): 373-384.
  18. Zhang Qiruo. A Brief Discussion on the Similarities and Differences between Butterfly Lovers and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Young Writers, 2021, (09): 144-146.
  19. Zhang Shihan. Comparative Analysis of Aesthetic Differences and Similarities in Chinese and Western Tragic Love Creation: A Case Study of A Dream of Red Mansions and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Home of Drama, 2021, (36): 23-24.
  20. Zou Zizhen. A Comparative Study of The Peony Pavilion and Romeo and Juliet [J]. Journal of Fuzhou Teachers College, 2002, (01): 1-7+16.