Research Article

Primary English Vocabulary Acquisition Based on Activity Theory and Multi-modal Learning—A Case Study on Power up 1 Textbook and PEP People’s Education Press Textbook

Danyang LiGuangdong University of Foreign Studies Siyu ZhangNanjing University of Information, Science & Technology Xiaoyu GouJilin University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study compares two English language textbooks, PEP Compulsory Education English Textbook Grade 1 (2023) and Power Up (2019) Level 1, to identify shortcomings in the teaching design of second language vocabulary acquisition and suggest improvement. Previous studies suggest that Knowledge Representation performs as the premise of vocabulary acquisition, and two representing approaches, Symbolic Representation and Embodied Representation, are widely used in vocabulary teaching. The derived Multi-modal Learning method, which uses multiple senses to promote memory, has also received attention and has been applied. This point is confirmed in both textbooks. To better study the whole process of vocabulary acquisition pretended in textbooks, this paper moves to Activity Theory, using the model of the Activity Triangle to describe and explain activities. With the method of Textual Analysis, three core elements - Subject, Object, and Community - appear in the same way in textbook use. However, compared to Power Up 1, the PEP textbook exhibits deficiencies in “rule” and “outcome,” leading to suboptimal learning effects. Further research needs to go beyond the text and introduce more methods to investigate the effects of the two textbooks to put forward more practical opinions and suggestions.

Keywords: vocabulary acquisition; activity theory; multi-modal learning; primary English; textbook.
Published: March 7, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.21249
Volume: CHR Vol.56
pp. 63-71
Download PDF

References

  1. Richards, J. C. (1976). The Role of Vocabulary Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585941
  2. Ren, W., Yang, T., & Wang, H. (2024). Language symbols and perceptual symbol representations on foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from behavior and EEG. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(5), 542-554.
  3. Bi, Y. (2021). Dual coding of knowledge in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 883-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.006
  4. Schwartz, A., Yeh, L.-H., & Shaw, M. (2008). Lexical representation of second language words: Implications for second language vocabulary acquisition and use. The Mental Lexicon, 3(3), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.3.04sch
  5. Wang, H., Jiang, Z., Feng, X., et al. (2020). Moral concepts’ spatial imagery: The joint effect of linguistic factors and embodied factors. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(2), 128-138.
  6. Bouchey, B., Castek, J., & Thygeson, J. (2021). Multimodal learning. In Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education (pp. 35–54). essay, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6
  7. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2017). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Bloomsbury Academic.
  8. Liu, F. (2023). An experimental study of junior high school English vocabulary teaching based on multimodal theory. Doctoral dissertation, Inner Mongolia Normal University.
  9. Comesana, M., Perea, M., Pineiro, A., & Fraga, I. (2009). Vocabulary teaching strategies and conceptual representations of words in L2 in children: Evidence with novice learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.004
  10. Lingling, Q (2018). Study on English teaching practice in primary school and lower grades based on English picture book reading. proceedings of the 2018 5th international conference on Education, Management, Arts, Economics and Social Science (ICEMAESS 2018). http://doi.org10.2991/icemaess-18.2018.199
  11. Gilakjani, A. P., Ismail, H. N., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of multimodal learning models on language teaching and learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1321-1327
  12. Zhang, L. (2008). Contemporary developments of Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development and their implications for education. Doctoral dissertation, Northeast Normal University.
  13. Leontyev, A. N. (1980). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Translated by Li Yi. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
  14. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
  15. Sun, H., & Liu, P. (2015). Examining learning activities from the perspective of activity theory. China Electric Education, 8, 29-35.
  16. Li, Y. (2023). A study of college English textbook usage from the perspective of activity theory. Doctoral dissertation, Jilin University.
  17. Chu, J., Liu, Y., & Li, J. (2024). Characteristics and operational processes of knowledge transfer activities in gamified learning from the perspective of activity theory. Journal of Intelligence, 43(1), 199-206.
  18. Thomas, A. (2013). A study of Algebra 1 students’ use of digital and print textbooks. Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia.
  19. Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: Students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 659-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0529-z
  20. Wu, Z. (2017). A study of the current status of the use of primary Chinese writing textbooks from the perspective of activity theory: A case study of the second stage of the North Normal University version (Doctoral dissertation). Minnan Normal University.
  21. Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying Sociocultural Theory to an Analysis of Learner Discourse: Learner-Learner Collaborative Interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development. Issues in Applied linguistics, 6(2), 93-121. http://doi.org/10.5070/L462005219