Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.55> Article
Research Article

Phonetic Approximation in Bilingual Pun and Their Impact on Response Times for Young Chinese-English Bilinguals

Jiaqing ChenMacquarie University* Daniel WangGeorgia School Ningbo Yichi ZhangShenzhen Middle School

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study, integrating psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives, investigates bilingual puns with phonetic approximations between two languages, Chinese and English, as a medium for humour and identity expression, and how phonetic approximations involving consonantal shifts (e.g., s/sh and f/h), vowel transformations, rhoticity, and additional schwa influence participants’ perception of bilingual pun stickers. A quantitative approach was used, involving two experiments: a speech production and perception task, and a response-time experiment. These assessed participants’ responses to phonetic approximations in controlled experiments and real-world pun stickers. The results indicate that phonetic similarity, particularly in consonants, leads to faster recognition times, while more pronounced differences, such as between /f/ and /h/, hinder recognition. Vowel roundness, diphthong shifts, and hiatuses were also found to significantly affect pun comprehension, whereas schwa insertion and rhoticity were less influential. The findings highlight the importance of phonetic awareness in bilingual education, with a focus on vowel and consonant accuracy in speech perception and production, and suggest applications of bilingual pun stickers in second language teaching, while acknowledging limitations such as sample size and the absence of multimodal analysis.

Keywords: Phonetic approximation; bilingual puns; bilingual phonetic perception; online stickers
Published: February 21, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.20907
Volume: CHR Vol.55
pp. 1-15
Download PDF

References

  1. Härmävaara, H.-I., & Frick, M. (2016). Handling Linguistic Asymmetries via Bilingual Punning in Conversations among Speakers of Cognate Languages. In Crossing Languages to Play with Words (Vol. 3, pp. 113–134). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110465600-008
  2. Friesen, D.C., & Jared, D. (2011). Cross-language phonological activation of meaning: evidence from category verification*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 145 - 156.
  3. Haigh, C. A., & Jared, D. (2007). The Activation of Phonological Representations by Bilinguals While Reading Silently: Evidence From Interlingual Homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.623
  4. Duyck, W. (2005). Translation and Associative Priming With Cross-Lingual Pseudohomophones: Evidence for Nonselective Phonological Activation in Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1340–1359. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1340
  5. Dijkstra, T., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Grainger, J. (1998). Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38(3-4), 177–196.
  6. Peng, J., Mansor, N. S., Kasim, Z. M., & Ang, L. H. (2023). A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Bilingual Puns in the Linguistic Landscapes of Guangzhou, China. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 23(1), 91–104.
  7. Sadia, H., & Hussain, M. S. (2023). Use of Emojis and Stickers for Online Interaction Facilitation: A Gender-Based Semiotic Discourse Analysis. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI(II), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).09
  8. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2019). Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings. International Journal of Communication, 13(0), 27. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10966
  9. Tang, Y., Hew, K. F., Herring, S. C., & Chen, Q. (2021). (Mis)communication through stickers in online group discussions: A multiple-case study. Discourse & Communication, 15(5), 582–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211017707
  10. Liu, R. (2023). WeChat online visual language among Chinese Gen Z: virtual gift, aesthetic identity, and affection language. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1172115
  11. Sampietro, A. (2023). El auge de los ‘stickers’ en WhatsApp y la evolución de la comunicación digital. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, 94(94), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.83860
  12. Aggarwal, A., Sharma, V., Trivedi, A., Yadav, M., Agrawal, C., Singh, D., Mishra, V.K., & Gritli, H. (2021). Two-Way Feature Extraction Using Sequential and Multimodal Approach for Hateful Meme Classification. Complex., 2021, 5510253:1-5510253:7.
  13. Ouaari, S., Tashu, T.M., & Horváth, T. (2022). Multimodal Feature Extraction for Memes Sentiment Classification. 2022 IEEE 2nd Conference on Information Technology and Data Science (CITDS), 285-290.
  14. Guerreiro, A., & Soares, N. M. M. (2016). Os memes vão além do humor: uma leitura multimodal para a construção de sentidos. Texto Digital (Florianópolis, SC, Brasil), 12(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.5007/1807-9288.2016v12n2p185
  15. Kawahara, S., & Shinohara, K. (2009). The role of psychoacoustic similarity in Japanese puns: A corpus study. Journal of Linguistics, 45(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226708005537
  16. Otake, T., & Cutler, A. (2013). Lexical Selection in Action: Evidence from Spontaneous Punning. Language and Speech, 56(4), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913478933
  17. Carrasco-Ortíz, H., Amengual, M., & Gries, S.T. (2019). Cross-language effects of phonological and orthographic similarity in cognate word recognition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
  18. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communications: Understanding Its Communicative Function, Impact, User Behavior, and Motive. New Media for Educational Change, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_16
  19. Lee, W. H., & Lin, Y. H. (2020). Online communication of visual information: Stickers’ functions of self-expression and conspicuousness. Online Information Review, 44(1), 43-61.
  20. Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Chen, S., Malibari, A., & Almotairi, M. (2020). Why do people purchase virtual goods? A uses and gratification (U&G) theory perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 53, 101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101376
  21. Jessica, G., & Franzia, E. (2017). The Analysis of Line Sticker Character “Cony Special Edition.” Humaniora, 8(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v8i3.3904
  22. Chen, T. Y., & Chao, T. W. (2018, July). The Relationship between User’s Preference and Social Role in Instant Messaging Application-Taking LINE’s Stickers as an Example. In 2018 1st IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII) (pp. 331-334). IEEE.
  23. Altukruni, R. (2022). A systematic literature review on the integration of internet memes in EFL/ESL classrooms. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13(4), 237-250.
  24. Ibraheem, S. D., & Abbas, N. F. (2016). A pragmatic study of humor. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 80-87.
  25. Karjo, C. H., & Rahmadhito, A. S. (2023). CYBERPRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL HUMOR IN WHATSAPP STICKERS. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA), 21(21), 45-54.
  26. Ana Cristina Carmelino, & Lídia Kogawa. (2020). O Humor Nos Stickers Do Whatsapp. PERcursos Linguísticos, 10(24), 185–204. https://periodicos.ufes.br/percursos/article/view/30065
  27. Morales, A., & Zhai, C. (2017). Identifying Humor in Reviews using Background Text Sources. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1051
  28. Cha, Y., Kim, J., Park, S., Yi, M.Y., & Lee, U. (2018). Complex and Ambiguous. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1 - 22.
  29. Smith, R.H., Hoogland, C.E., & Brown, E.G. (2019). Once a pun a time: Exploring factors associated with perceptions of humorous punning. HUMOR, 33, 7 - 28.
  30. Kauer, S. D., Mangan, C., & Sanci, L. (2014). Do Online Mental Health Services Improve Help-Seeking for Young People? A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(3), e66. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3103
  31. Franzia, E. (2020). The Line Stickers as the Youngsters Ethnic Identity and Media Representation. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.019
  32. Bulut, T., & Almabrouk, N. (2020). The functions of puns in “Alice’s adventures in wonderland”. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 20(1), 172-185.
  33. Djafarova, E. (2008). Why Do Advertisers Use Puns? A Linguistic Perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(2), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.2501/s0021849908080306
  34. Gan, X. (2015). A study of the humor aspect of English puns: views from the Relevance Theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(6), 1211.
  35. Solska, A. (2012). The relevance-based model of context in processing puns. Research in Language, 10(4), 387-404.
  36. Norwanto, N., & Bahroni, B. (2023). Don’t Rich People Difficult: Bilingual Puns on Indonesian Truck Graffiti. Journal of Pragmatics Research.
  37. Fomin, A. G., & Medvedev, S. S. (2019). AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF BILINGUAL PUNS.
  38. Sarkonak, R.W., & Hodgson, R.B. (1993). Seeing in Depth: The Practice of Bilingual Writing. Visible Language, 27, 6-39.
  39. Furlong, Á. (2009). The relation of plurilingualism/culturalism to creativity: a matter of perception. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6, 343 - 368.
  40. Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Semantic Ambiguity within and across Languages: An Integrative Review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1266 - 1303.
  41. Werker, J. F., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Fennell, C. T. (2009). Bilingual beginnings to learning words. Philosophical Transactions-Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3649–3663. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0105
  42. Bosch, L. (2010). The Acquisition of Language-Specific Sound Categories from a Bilingual Input.
  43. Medeiros, A. C. D. de, Santos, M. F. P. dos, Varela, F. V. da C., Rocha, T. A. de L., Messias, B. L. C., & Azoni, C. A. S. (2020). Bilingualism in the development of phonological awareness skills: an integrative literature review. Revista CEFAC, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20202240320
  44. Wiener, S. (2011). Grass-Mud Horses to Victory: The Phonological Constraints of Subversive Puns.
  45. Attardo, S. (2018). Universals in puns and humorous wordplay. In Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research (Vol. 6, pp. 89–110). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110586374-005
  46. Leigh, J.H. (1994). The Use of Figures of Speech in Print Ad Headlines. Journal of Advertising, 23, 17-33.