Assessing the Effectiveness of Current Mainstream English Teaching Methods in Economically Disadvantaged Regions of China
Abstract
While extensive research has explored English teaching methods in urban China, their applicability and effectiveness in rural areas remain underexamined. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the challenges and effectiveness of mainstream methods such as Grammar-Translation Method (GTM), Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), and Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in economically disadvantaged regions. The research utilizes theoretical analysis, drawing on secondary data from prior studies and applying frameworks like Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory. It examines rural students' learning environments, including resource deficiencies, underqualified teachers, and limited English exposure. The findings indicate that while GTM is effective for improving grammar and reading, it fails to build communicative competence or sustain student motivation. CLT and TBLT show potential but are constrained by resource and expertise deficiencies prevalent in rural settings. The study concludes that integrating online technology, enhancing teacher training, and fostering community-based initiatives could improve the efficacy of English teaching in rural China, bridging the educational gap between urban and rural areas.
References
- Milawati.(2019). Grammar Translation Method: Current Practice In EFL Context. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Vol. 4(1). .
- Hu, Y. (2007). China’s foreign language policy on primary English education: What’s behind it?. Language Policy, 6, 359-376.
- Yao, C. (2022). Is a one-way English immersion teaching approach equitable to those Chinese non-English major students from rural areas?. Education and Urban Society, 54(4), 470-486.
- Ma, L., Xiao, L., & Liu, J. (2024). Motivational beliefs of urban and rural students in English as a foreign language learning: The case of China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(5), 1524-1537.
- Fang, F. (2010). A discussion on developing students’ communicative competence in college English teaching in China. Journal of language teaching and research, 1(2), 111-116.
- Butler, Y. G. (2014). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Research papers in education, 29(4), 410-437.
- Krashen, Stephen. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
- Xiao, L. X. (2009). A new paradigm of teaching English in China: An Eclectic Model. The Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 271-291.
- Qi, G. Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China: perceptions of students. Multilingual Education, 6, 1-18.
- Hansen, M. H. (2012). Recent trends in Chinese rural education: the disturbing rural–urban disparities and the measures to meet them. In Towards a New Development Paradigm in Twenty-First Century China (pp. 165-178). Routledge.
- Wu, X., & Tarc, P. (2024). Challenges and possibilities in English language learning of rural lower-class Chinese college students: the effect of capital, habitus, and fields. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(4), 957-972.