Research Article

An Analysis of Ethics and Perspective Sentences

Boyu WuNorthwest Normal University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Moral languages and perspective sentences are different from indicative sentences. Inspired by Hare, the article tries to illuminate the fallacy of ethical naturalism, as well as the insufficiency of Davidsonian truth-conditional semantics by demonstrating the distinctive character of perspective sentences which cannot be thoroughly appreciated by formal semantics alone. Value words function distinctively than descriptive words, it is a mistake of naturalism to take value ascription the same as property description. Perspective sentences differ from indicative sentences because of their commending power and speakers’ intentionality. By showing how the intentionality and commending power are diminished when treating perspective sentences and indicative sentences as equal, the article argues that a new perspective is required to investigate moral semantics in a more appropriate way. With proper modification, phenomenology and virtue theory have the potential of becoming the new field of ethical investigation, and further reconciliation between the two traditions can yield fruitful results

Keywords: Ethics; Semantics; Truth-condition; Intentionality
Published: January 9, 2025
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.20370
Volume: CHR Vol.62
pp. 91-97
Download PDF

References

  1. Quine, W V, From a logical Point of View, 2nd ed. (Harper&Row, Publisher, New York, Hagerstown, San Fransisco, 1961, 6.
  2. Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge university Press.
  3. Hare, R M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. Tarski, Alfred. 1944. The Semantic Conception of Truth: And the Foundations of Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3): 341.
  5. Searle, John Richard. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford [U.A.] Wiley-Blackwell.
  7. Brandom, Robert. 1998. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  8. Tugendhat, Ernst. 2016. Traditional and Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Davidson, Donald. 2001. The emergence of thought. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 123–134).
  10. Schwartz, Barry, and Kenneth Sharpe. 2010. Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to Do the Right Thing. New York: Riverhead Books.