Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.52> Article
Research Article

Better Sexual Education Design for Children: Based on the Characteristics of Children’s Sexual Psychological Development

Yueyang HuWenzhou-Kean University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

To make children enter puberty with a healthy sexual mentality, it is very important to carry out pre-adolescent sex education that is corresponding to the characteristics of psychological development stages of children. However, there are no studies that specifically address the characteristics of children's psychosexual development, and few studies that explore how sex education can be targeted at each stage of a child's development. This paper intends to examine the traits of children's psychosexual development across various stages, utilizing Piaget’s and Erikson’s developmental theories, summarize the findings, and explore how sex education resources should align with the developmental characteristics of children at different ages to enhance contemporary childhood sexuality education. This study conducts an unbiased and methodical analysis of the global literature from 1970–2024. The gaps and comprehensiveness of earlier studies are also assessed, and possible strategies for further strengthening child sex education are proposed based on the theories and techniques they provide. The research shows that Piaget's theory has a profound significance for studying the characteristics of sexual psychological development of preoperational children, and can be used as a reference for the design of gender identity curriculum. Erikson's theory is expected to be applied to the study of the psychological characteristics of social sexual interaction and the teaching design of children from 6 years old to pre-adolescence.

Keywords: Sex Education; Children Development; Piaget; Erikson
Published: December 31, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.19152
Volume: CHR Vol.52
pp. 186-192
Download PDF

References

  1. Lameiras-Fernández M, Martínez-Román R, Carrera-Fernández MV, Rodríguez-Castro Y. (2021). Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(5):2555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052555. PMID: 33806507; PMCID: PMC7967369.
  2. AJ, R. T. (2017). Condom use, number of partners and sexual debut in young people in penile-vaginal intercourse, oral sex and anal sex. Revista internacional de andrologia, 16(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2017.02.009
  3. CDC. (2024). National Overview of STIs in 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/annual/summary.html
  4. Magnusson B.M., Crandall A., Evans K. (2019). Early sexual debut and risky sex in young adults: The role of low self-control. BMC Public Health. 19:1483. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7734-9.
  5. Williams E.A., Jensen R.E. (2016). Conflicted identification in the sex education classroom: Balancing professional values with organizational mandates. Qual. Health Res. 26:1574–1586. doi: 10.1177/1049732315599955
  6. Lindberg L.D., Maddow-Zimet I., Boonstra H. (2016). Changes in adolescents’ receipt of sex education, 2006–2013. J. Adolesc. Health. 58:621–627. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.004.
  7. Tabatabaie, A. (2015). Childhood and adolescent sexuality, Islam, and problematics of sex education: a call for re-examination. Sex Education, 15(3), 276-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1005836
  8. Goldfarb, E. S., & Lieberman, L. D. (2021). Three decades of research: The case for comprehensive sex education. Journal of Adolescent health, 68(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.036
  9. Robinson, K. H., Smith, E., & Davies, C. (2017). Responsibilities, tensions and ways forward: parents’ perspectives on children’s sexuality education. Sex Education, 17(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2017.1301904
  10. Zhou, S., Cheung, M. (2022). Sex Education Programs for Preteens: A Review of Relevant Outcome Studies in Nine Countries. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 39, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00713-0
  11. Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory.
  12. Thompson, S. K., & Bentler, P. M. (1973). A developmental study of gender constancy and parent preference. Archives of sexual Behavior, 2(4), 379-385.
  13. Breese, R. W. (1978). The application of Piagetian theory to sexuality: a preliminary exploration. Adolescence, 13(50), 269.
  14. Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children's search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current directions in psychological science, 13(2), 67-70.
  15. Ruble, D. N., Taylor, L. J., Cyphers, L., Greulich, F. K., Lurye, L. E., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). The role of gender constancy in early gender development. Child development, 78(4), 1121-1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01056.x
  16. Nutbrown, C. (ND). Gender stereotyping in Early Years – Examples, ideas and how to challenge them. https://www.teachearlyyears.com/a-unique-child/view/gender-stereotyping-in-the-early-years
  17. Syed, M., & McLean, K. C. (2017). Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zf35d
  18. Gilbert, J. (2007). Risking a relation: Sex education and adolescent development. Sex Education, 7(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810601134736
  19. Kang, G., Park, T., Han, S., & Park, J. (2012, November). The effects of an encouragement program on inferiority feeling and self-esteem of children. In International Conference on Modeling and Simulation (pp. 317-324). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35248-5_45
  20. Erikson, E. (1963). The developmental stages of Erik Erikson.
  21. Abbott, K., Ellis, S., & Abbott, R. (2015). “We Don’t Get Into All That”: An Analysis of How Teachers Uphold Heteronormative Sex and Relationship Education. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(12), 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078203
  22. Batra, S. (2013). The psychosocial development of children: Implications for education and society—Erik Erikson in context. Contemporary education dialogue, 10(2), 249-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184913485014