Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.52> Article
Research Article

From Pseudo-Intimacy to Cyber Romance: A Study of Human and AI Companions’ Emotion Shaping and Engagement Practices

Ruoyu GeCity University of Hong Kong*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

With the rapid development of AI technology, AI chatbots offer new possibilities for intimate relationships. This study conducted in-depth interviews with 23 users who had established intimate relationships with Replika. The investigation identified the reasons for the emergence of intimate relationships between humans and AI chatbots, the generation mechanism and the impact on real-world interaction practices. It shows that, under the dual influence of technological progress and the emotional dilemmas prevalent in modern society, traditional pseudo-intimacy is gradually shifting toward cyber romance. The shaping of cyber romance between people and their AI companions is a complex mechanism that interacts with multiple factors. Intimacy with AI companions profoundly impacts users' real-life social practices, both positively and negatively. Meanwhile, this study explored the critical role emotional projection plays in human-AI intimate relationships, the modern emotional responsibilities and moral boundaries reshaped by human-AI intimate relationships, and the benefits and risks brought about by AI companions as emotional substitutes. This study observed the development of human-machine relationships to understand how AI can reshape the emotional landscape by transitioning human-machine relationships from pseudo-intimacy to real intimacy. It reveals the role of AI in emotional influence and provides new perspectives on future human intimacy and AI ethics.

Keywords: AI Chatbot; Digital Companion; Pseudo-intimacy; Replika; Human Machine Interaction
Published: December 31, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.19122
Volume: CHR Vol.52
pp. 211-221
Download PDF

References

  1. Waern, A. (2011) ‘I’m in love with someone that doesn’t exist!’ bleed in the context of a computer game. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 3(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.3.3.239_1
  2. Merkle, E.R. and Richardson, R. A. (2000) Digital Dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00187.x
  3. Levy, D. (2010) Falling in love with a companion. Natural Language Processing, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.13lev
  4. Hua, S. and Xiao, C. (2023) What shapes a parasocial relationship in RVGs? The effects of Avatar images, avatar identification, and romantic jealousy among potential, casual, and Core Players. Computers in Human Behavior, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107504
  5. Banks, J. and Bowman, N. D. (2014) Avatars are (sometimes) people too: Linguistic indicators of Parasocial and social ties in player–avatar relationships. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554898
  6. Levy, D. (2007) Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper.
  7. Rane, A., Ranade, C., Bandekar, H., Jadhav, R. and Chitre, V. (2022) AI driven chatbot and its evolution. 2022 5th International Conference on Advances in Science and Technology (ICAST), 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/icast55766.2022.10039515
  8. Song, M. and Liu, Y. (2023) Adventures in Communication: Human-AI Dialogue Interaction and Intimate Relationship Development. News & Writing, (7), 64–74.
  9. Chaves, A.P. and Gerosa, M.A. (2020) How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human–chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
  10. Jain, M., Kumar, P., Kota, R. and Patel, S.N. (2018) Evaluating and informing the design of Chatbots. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196735
  11. Zhang, X. and Sun, J. (2023) Speaking to Virtual AI: An Exploration of Users’ Emotional Connection to Chatbots - The Case of Software Replika. Modern Communication, 45(9), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.19997/j.cnki.xdcb.2023.09.006
  12. Fan, H. and Poole, M. S. (2006) What is personalization? Perspectives on the design and implementation of personalization in information systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 16(3), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327744joce1603&4_2
  13. Schuetz, A. (1944) The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2771547
  14. Horton, D. and Wohl, R.R. (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  15. Theran, S.A., Newberg, E.M. and Gleason, T.R. (2010. Adolescent girls’ parasocial interactions with media figures. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(3), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2010.483700
  16. Roesler, E., Manzey, D. and Onnasch, L. (2021) A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Science Robotics, 6(58). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abj5425
  17. Verbeek, P. P. (2005) Artifacts and attachment: A post-script philosophy of mediation. Inside the Politics of Technology, 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048503841.007
  18. Trauttmansdorff, P. (2023) Elliott Anthony (2023) algorithmic intimacy. The Digital Revolution in personal relationships. Science & Technology Studies, 36(3), 78–80. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.126958
  19. Ven, I. van de. (2022) Attention and affective proximity. Mediatisation of Emotional Life, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003254287-10
  20. Yamaguchi, H. (2020) “Intimate relationship” with “virtual humans” and the “socialification” of familyship. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 11(1), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0023
  21. Yolgörmez, C. (2020) Machinic encounters: A relational approach to the sociology of AI. The Cultural Life of Machine Learning, 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_5
  22. Nake, F. and Grabowski, S. (2001) Human–computer interaction viewed as pseudo-communication. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(8), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-7051(01)00140-x
  23. Potdevin, D., Clavel, C. and Sabouret, N. (2018) Virtual intimacy, this little something between us. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 3, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267851.3267884
  24. Danaher, J. (2019) Regulating child sex robots: Restriction or experimentation? Medical Law Review, 27(4), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwz002
  25. Zhou, Y. and Fischer, M.H. (2020) Intimate relationships with humanoid robots. Maschinenliebe, 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29864-7_14
  26. Li, H. and Zhang, R. (2024) Finding love in algorithms: Deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with Ai Chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae015
  27. Guskar, E.W. (2021) How to feel about emotionalized artificial intelligence? when robot pets, holograms, and chatbots become affective partners. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(4), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09598-8
  28. Pal, D., Babakerkhell, M. D., Papasratorn, B. and Funilkul, S. (2023) Intelligent attributes of voice assistants and user’s love for AI: A SEM-based study. IEEE Access, 11, 60889–60903. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3286570
  29. Giddens, A. (1992) The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford University Press.
  30. Zhang, Z. (2021) Impact and deconstruction of artificial intelligence on marriage value. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 643–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79200-8_95
  31. Sádaba, C. (2023) Algorithmic intimacy. The digital revolution in personal relationships, de Anthony Elliott. Estudios Públicos, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.38178/07183089/1024230710
  32. Williams, R. (1977) Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.