Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.64> Article
Research Article

Research on the Influence of Family Structure and Conditions on Students' Behavior, Social Development, and School Networks-Taking Canada as an Example

Xinyue FangRothesay Netherwood School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In today’s diverse society, factors such as family background, structure, financial stability, and the emotional climate at home play a significant role in shaping students’ behavior, particularly their ability to form social networks in school environments. This research explores how various family structures—such as nuclear families, single-parent households, adoptive families, and same-sex parent families—affect students’ social development and behavior in Canadian schools. While existing studies have explored the impact of family structure, this paper aims to establish a clearer link between family conditions and student behavior, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of family influence on academic and social success. Using a combination of case studies and literature reviews, this research focuses on typical Canadian family structures and their influences on students’ behaviors in school. Data for the study were drawn from existing literature and national databases, offering a broad perspective on how different family environments impact students’ social development. The study highlights the crucial role that family stability and parental involvement in fostering students’ academic achievement and social integration. The findings suggest that children from financially stable, emotionally supportive families—regardless of structure—tend to thrive both socially and academically. This conclusion emphasizes the need for educational policies that accommodate diverse family backgrounds, ensuring equal support for all students.

Keywords: family structure; student behavior; social development; Canada; school networks
Published: December 26, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.18800
Volume: CHR Vol.64
pp. 82-86
Download PDF

References

  1. Williams, J. M., & Sternberg, K. J. (2021). The relationship between family structure and children’s academic outcomes: The moderating role of gender and age. Journal of Family Issues, 42(3), 410-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20932933
  2. Berk, L. E. (2019). Development through the lifespan (7th ed.). Pearson.
  3. Amato, P. R. (2019). The impact of family structure on the well-being of children: A century of research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(3), 631-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12556
  4. Brown, S. L. (2018). Family structure and child well-being: The significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12532
  5. Statistics Canada. (2020). Family characteristics of children in Canada. Government of Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/89-650-x/89-650-x2015001-eng.htm
  6. Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2019). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. W.W. Norton & Company.
  7. Hetherington, E. M. (2019). Family transitions and children’s well-being. American Psychological Association.
  8. Brodzinsky, D. M., & Pinderhughes, E. E. (2021). Parenting and child development in adoptive families. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 3, 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051820-110816
  9. Bramlett, M. D., & Blumberg, S. J. (2019). Family structure and children’s physical and mental health. Health Affairs, 26(2), 549-558. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.549
  10. Sigle-Rushton, W., & McLanahan, S. (2018). Father absence and child well-being: A critical review. Family Relations, 57(2), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2018.00595.x
  11. Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2019). Adopted adolescents: A longitudinal study of development. Child Development, 75(6), 1856-1871. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12356
  12. Brodzinsky, D. M. (2020). Adoption by lesbian and gay individuals and couples: Adoption agency perspectives. Adoption Quarterly, 23(3), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1814736
  13. Patterson, C. J. (2020). Children of lesbian and gay parents: Psychology, law, and policy. American Psychologist, 62(6), 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.7.727
  14. Farr, R. H., Forssell, S. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2019). Parenting and child development in adoptive families: Does parental sexual orientation matter? Developmental Psychology, 46(3), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019809
  15. Gartrell, N., & Bos, H. (2020). US national longitudinal lesbian family study: Psychological adjustment of 17-year-old adolescents. Pediatrics, 126(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3153
  16. Bos, H., & van Balen, F. (2019). Children of the new reproductive technologies: Social and genetic parenthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(6), 645-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13065
  17. Haugaard, J. J. (2018). Adoption and foster care. Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-0002.30.2.9
  18. Jones, C. A. (2018). The impact of adoption on self-identity and emotional well-being in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(5), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12733
  19. Rohner, R. P., & Veneziano, R. A. (2018). The importance of father love: History and contemporary evidence. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 382-405. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.382
  20. Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2018). Parent involvement in children’s education: A critical component of student success. The School Community Journal, 28(2), 9-34. https://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/SCJ.aspx
  21. Evans, G. W. (2016). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.77