Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.48> Article
Research Article

Sexism in Interior: Feminine Design in a Male-Centric Domain

Ruolin YuPratt Institute*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines how gender-based differences are reflected in architecture, especially in interior and furniture design, mainly through evaluating male-centric design standards and feminine design approaches. Traditionally, the architectural industry has been dominated by men solely. According to Le Corbusier’s Scale of Modulor and Adolf Loos’ Villa Muller, male designers produce standardized and fixed products in the contemporary era, which require users to adjust to the designs. In contrast, female designers like Charlotte Perriand, Lily Reich, etc. contribute to breaking the male-centric design norms with flexibility and mobility to achieve individual needs, trying to revise the relationship between users and products. While other researchers focus mainly on the expansion of design standards within the male domain, this paper is dedicated to bringing to the front the ongoing struggle for gender equality and justice and advocating for a more diverse and inclusive atmosphere not only in the design industry but also in the entire society.

Keywords: interior design; gender; standards; flexibility; feminine
Published: December 26, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.18752
Volume: CHR Vol.48
pp. 97-105
Download PDF

References

  1. Hosey, Lance. “Hidden Lines: Gender, Race, and the Body in ‘Graphic Standards.’” Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), vol. 55, no. 2, 2001, pp. 101–12. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1425611. Accessed 6 Aug. 2024.
  2. Fig. 1. Le Corbusier. Modulor. 1950. JSTOR, https://jstor.org/stable/community.16513680. Accessed 24 July 2024.
  3. Colomina, Beatriz. “Privacy and Publicity : Modern Architecture as Mass Media.” MIT Press eBooks, 1994, ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA28150954.
  4. Fig. 2. “The Villa Müller.” Adolf Loos, 17 Aug. 2017, adolfloos.cz/en/villa-muller. Accessed 25 July 2024.
  5. Fig. 3. Del Campo, Matias. “Deep house - datasets, estrangement, and the problem of the new.” Architectural Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1, 29 Aug. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-022- 00013-w.
  6. Rossi, Catharine. “Furniture, Feminism and the Feminine: Women Designers in Post-War Italy, 1945 to 1970.” Journal of Design History, vol. 22, no. 3, 2009, pp. 24357.JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40301449. Accessed 16 July 2024.
  7. Fig. 4. Giovannini, Joseph. “Charlotte Perriand, Stepping out of Corbusier’s Shadow.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 21 Nov. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/11/21/arts/design/charlotte-perriand-le-corbusier-review.html. Accessed 25 July 2024.
  8. Giovannini, Joseph. “Charlotte Perriand, Stepping out of Corbusier’s Shadow.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 21 Nov. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/11/21/arts/design/
  9. Fig. 5. Fabrizi, Mariabruna. “‘Café Samt and Seide’ by Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe and Lilly Reich (1927).” SOCKS, 10 Feb. 2018, socks-studio.com/2016/02/29/cafe-samt-seide-by-ludwig- mies-van-der-rohe-and-lilly-reich-1927. Accessed 26 July 2024.
  10. Franco, José Tomás. “Curtains as Room Dividers: Towards a Fluid and Adaptable Architecture.” ArchDaily, 2 Dec. 2023, www.archdaily.com/936540/curtains-as-room-dividers-towards-a-fluid-and-adaptable-architecture. Accessed 25 July 2024.
  11. Esther da Costa Meyer. “Cruel Metonymies: Lilly Reich’s Designs for the 1937 World’s Fair.” New German Critique, no. 76, 1999, pp. 161–89. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/488661. Accessed 18 July 2024.
  12. Martínez, Javier Gimeno. “Women Only: Design Events Restricted to Female Designers during the 1990s.” Design Issues, vol. 23, no. 2, 2007, pp. 17–30. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25224103. Accessed 31 July 2024.
  13. Fig. 6. Martínez, Javier Gimeno. “Women Only: Design Events Restricted to Female Designers during the 1990s.” Design Issues, vol. 23, no. 2, 2007, pp. 17–30. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25224103.Accessed 31 July 2024.
  14. Buckley, Cheryl. “Made in Patriarchy: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design.” Design Issues, vol. 3, no. 2, 1986, pp. 3–14. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1511480. Accessed 25 Aug. 2024.