Research Article

A Study of Language Metaphor and Emotional Expression from the Perspective of Second Language Acquisition

Ruofei JiaThe High School Affiliated to RenMin University of China No. 37 Zhongguancun Street Haidian District Beijing* Zitong YangThe High School Affiliated to RenMin University of China No. 37 Zhongguancun Street Haidian District Beijing

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Metaphors are a critical aspect of acquiring English. It is grounded in the conceptual system of English L1 users, so there might be a discrepancy between the comprehension and utilization of learners of English as L2, especially if the metaphors entail one aspect of pragmatics, emotion. This paper concentrates on the comprehension and utilization of emotion metaphors in L2 English learners, composing mainly of high school students. The participants must fill out a questionnaire containing seven questions examining the aspects mentioned above of emotion metaphors and metaphors. After analyzing the answers, comprehension can be categorized into two categories—basic and deep. By dividing the level of comprehension, a correlation can be drawn between the comprehension level and production of emotion metaphors, using MIP, an established method to identify whether there is a metaphorical expression or not in a discourse. This paper tests the less focused side of the metaphor study, trying to draw a primary conclusion on the relationship between comprehension and utilization of metaphors in hopes of allowing learners of English as L2 to understand more about the mechanism of metaphors and how they are applied to describe emotions.

Keywords: Second Language Learning; Metaphors; Pragmatics
Published: May 17, 2023
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/3/20220509
Volume: CHR Vol.3
pp. 580-591
Download PDF

References

  1. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press, 2003.
  2. Paris, Justine. “The Expression of Emotions by Second Language Learners: Metaphor as a Linguistic Vehicle.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 50, no. 1, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0006.
  3. Fainsilber, Lynn, and Andrew Ortony. “Metaphorical Uses of Language in the Expression of Emotions.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, vol. 2, no. 4, Dec. 1987, pp. 239–50, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0204_2.
  4. Schnall, Simone. The Pragmatics of Emotion Language. Accessed 18 Sept. 2022.
  5. Yu, Ning. “Metaphorical Expressions of Anger and Happiness in English and Chinese.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, vol. 10, no. 2, June 1995, pp. 59–92, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1.
  6. Hoang, Ho. “Metaphor and Second Language Learning: The Stats of the Field.” The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, vol. 18, no. 2, Aug. 2014.
  7. Tran, Giao Quynh. “Pragmatic and Discourse Markedness Hypothsis.” Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, vol. 1, no. 1-9, 2002.
  8. Littlemore, Jeannette, et al. “Difficulties in Metaphor Comprehension Faced by International Students Whose First Language Is Not English.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 32, no. 4, Mar. 2011, pp. 408–29, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009.
  9. Group, Pragglejaz. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 1–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752.