Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.52> Article
Research Article

The Rise and Assimilation of Western Queer Cinema: Resistance and Dilemma in the Mainstream

Yitian ZhuUniversity of Liverpool*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Queer cinema has risen to prominence in recent years, frequently featured at major international film festivals and gaining a foothold in the global market. As an extension of queer theory, which highlights the fluidity of gender and sexuality, queer cinema initially aimed to challenge traditional gender norms and heteronormativity through radical narrative structures and visual expressions. Early queer films often subverted mainstream narratives, offering an alternative, politically charged lens to explore marginalized identities. However, as queer cinema has increasingly entered the mainstream market, it has been subjected to assimilation and commodification pressures. This has led to a dilution of its radical and subversive elements, as the narratives are increasingly shaped to fit within heteronormative frameworks. Queer characters, once at the centre of challenging societal norms, are now often marginalized or simplified to meet the expectations of broader, more mainstream audiences. This paper examines how capitalism and patriarchy have contributed to the assimilation and marginalization of queer cinema, limiting its political expression and cultural impact. While Russo highlights how Hollywood perpetuates lazy stereotypes of queer characters, White suggests that cinema, as a tool of capitalist and patriarchal power, helps maintain normative gender and sexual roles. Despite these challenges, queer cinema remains an important cultural tool for breaking down stereotypes and resisting the dominance of heteronormativity. To maintain its relevance and continue its political and cultural resistance, queer cinema must resist commodification and strive for more diverse, authentic representations of queer identities.

Keywords: Queer Cinema; mainstream movie; assimilation; marginalization; Queer theory
Published: December 19, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2024.18504
Volume: CHR Vol.52
pp. 74-80
Download PDF

References

  1. Lonac, S. (2022). The Mainstreaming of American Queer Cinema. Canadian Review of American Studies, 52(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-2021-013
  2. Warner, M. 1993. Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
  3. White, P. (2000). Uninvited: classical Hollywood cinema and lesbian representability. Choice Reviews Online, 37(11), 37–6181. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-6181
  4. Russo, V. (1991). The Celluloid Closet : Homosexuality in the movies. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA21183354
  5. Burns, N. (2023). “It means possibility.” Lateral, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.25158/l12.1.3
  6. Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Tendencies. In Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381860
  7. Butler, J. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
  8. Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA25990915
  9. Rohy, V. (2018). 10. The Cinema of the Impossible: Queer Theory and Narrative. In Edinburgh University Press eBooks (pp. 145–156). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474424752-014
  10. Benshoff, H. M., & Griffin, S. (2006). Queer images: a history of gay and lesbian film in America. Choice Reviews Online, 43(09), 43–5168. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-5168
  11. Whatling, C. (1997). Screen dreams : fantasising lesbians in film / Clare Whatling. Manchester University Press.
  12. Bennett, J. (2006). A queer anxiety. Journal of Homosexuality, 52(1–2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v52n01_05
  13. Bell, M. (2016). The boys in the band: Flashpoints of Cinema, History, and Queer Politics. Wayne State University Press.
  14. Richards, S. (2016). A New Queer Cinema renaissance. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 1(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1386/qsmpc.1.2.215_1
  15. Needham, G. (2010). Brokeback Mountain. In Edinburgh University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748633845
  16. Pellegrini, C. (2022). Anticipating the plot: overdetermining heteronormative destiny on the twenty-first century screen. Textual Practice, 37(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2022.2043932
  17. Dyer, R. (1977). Gays and film. https://www.amazon.com/Gays-film-Richard-Dyer-editor/dp/0851700659
  18. Keeling, K. (2007). The Witch’s Flight. In Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390145
  19. Holmlund, C., & Fuchs, C. (1997). Between the Sheets, In the Streets: Queer, Lesbian, Gay documentary. In University of Minnesota Press eBooks. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA47316817
  20. Creekmur, C., & Doty, A. (1995). Out in culture. In Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822397441
  21. Goldin, D. (2022). A male glance at the “Male Gaze.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 42(7), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2022.2121150
  22. Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: transgender bodies, subcultural lives. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA70887604
  23. McBean, S. (2018). 9. Digital intimacies and queer narratives. In Edinburgh University Press eBooks (pp. 132–144). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474424752-013