Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.62> Article
Research Article

Difference and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Hu Shi's and Lu Xun's Research on Water Margin

Lili ChuCommunication University of China*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Both Hu Shi(胡适)and Lu Xun(鲁迅)conducted considerable research and evaluations on Water Margin(《水浒传》)and its major sequels. Various factors, such as historical context and personal perspectives, contributed to the divergence in their views. Hu Shi distinguished between Water Margin’s utility in the New Literature Movement and its ideological content. While he elevated Water Margin’s status as "vernacular" literature, he did not endorse certain ideological aspects within the text. Lu Xun, on the other hand, affirmed the revolutionary spirit in Water Margin but criticized its incompleteness and feudal characteristics. The contrasting evaluations of the same text by Hu Shi and Lu Xun in the same era stem from their differing perspectives and positions.

Keywords: Hu Shi; Lu Xun; Water Margin; Comparative Study
Published: December 12, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/2025.18138
Volume: CHR Vol.62
pp. 14-20
Download PDF

References

  1. Zhu, W. (1982). On Hu Shi's methodology in Research on Chinese Chapter Novels. Jianghuai Forum, (06), 89-95 + 100.
  2. Bai, Z., & Jiang, F. (2002). A comparative study of the early literary views and methodologies of Lu Xun and Hu Shi. Academic Monthly, (03), 13-20.
  3. Zhang, Y. (2011). The influence of Huxley’s "Doubtism" on Hu Shi’s novel studies: A case study of Hu Shi’s Research on Water Margin and Dream of the Red Chamber. Dongyue Luncong, 32(02), 59-62.
  4. Ouyang, J. (1981). How did Lu Xun comment on Water Margin? Qiusuo, (04), 99-103.
  5. Huang, N. (1982). Did Lu Xun really comment on Water Margin this way? A discussion on "How did Lu Xun comment on Water Margin?" Qiusuo, (04), 79-83.
  6. Diao, Y., & Zhou, L. (1955). From Hu Shi’s Research on Water Margin to He Xin’s Study on Water Margin. Literature, History and Philosophy, (09), 2-7.
  7. Si, Y. (1975). Marxism as a mirror for revealing surrenderists: A critique of Hu Shi's class harmony theory in his Research on Water Margin. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, (02), 16-23.
  8. Yu, S. (1975). A critique of the reactionary essence of Hu Shi's Research on Water Margin. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (04), 33-39.
  9. Fang, Y. (1975). Let the people know about the surrenderists: Learning from Lu Xun's discussions on Water Margin. Journal of Yanbian University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (03), 5-7 + 18.
  10. Lu, L. (2011). Hu Shi's Research on Water Margin and studies on Jin Shengtan. Literary Heritage, (05), 129-136.
  11. Ding, Y. (1987). The examination and differing evaluations of Water Margin: The Sequel by Lu Xun and Hu Shi. Lu Xun Research Trends, (08), 48-50.
  12. Song, C. (2009). Questioning the evaluation standards for sequels to Water Margin: A reflection on the claim that Water Margin: The Sequel is “progressive” while Fighting Bandits is “reactionary.” Research on Ming and Qing Novels, (01), 56-66.
  13. Zhou, Z. (1918). The Literature of Humanity. New Youth, 5(6).
  14. Hu, Sh. (2003). The Complete Works of Hu Shi. Hefei: Anhui Education Press.
  15. Lu, X. (2015). The Complete Works of Lu Xun . Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.
  16. Chen, Y. (2022). Intertextuality in Lu Xun’s Novel At the Restaurant and the Story of Lin Chong in Water Margin. Dongyue Luncong, 43(07), 51-57.
  17. Mao, Z. (1991). On Contradiction. In Selected Works of Mao Zedong (Vol. 1). Beijing: People’s Publishing House.