Research Article

Research on the Dissemination of Controversial Events on Chinese Social Media Platforms: A Case Study of the Issue of “Fat Cat Incident”

Yuanting HuangXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University Shengtao LiGuangzhou City University of Technology Jiayi ZhangKing’s College London*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The social media platform represented by Weibo, due to its immediacy, interactivity, and large user base, exerts a profound impact on the formation and development of public opinion. In this context, events that are the subject of controversy on social media can spread rapidly, triggering widespread social discussion and emotional fluctuations in a very short time. The “Fat Cat Incident” is a case in point, as it rapidly ignited public opinion through social media and became a widely discussed topic. The actions and statements of the various stakeholders involved in the incident, including public figures, companies, and the media, significantly influenced the dissemination of the event and the direction of public discourse on social media platforms. This phenomenon has sparked extensive discussions about how social media shapes public opinion, guides public emotions, and reflects deeper societal issues. This article will examine the mechanisms of dissemination and the formation of public opinion surrounding controversial events on social media platforms, with the “Fat Cat Incident” serving as a case study.

Keywords: Fat Cat Incident; Social Media; Online Influencers; Public Opinion; Controversy Online Incident.
Published: November 26, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/51/20242587
Volume: CHR Vol.51
pp. 153-163
Download PDF

References

  1. Peng, Y. (2016) Patterns and Characteristics of Agenda Setting in Weibo We-Media -A Study of Ctrip.com’s Failed Airline Ticket Disputes.” Communication and Copyright, (08): 80-82. DOI: 10.16852/j.cnki.45-1390/g2.2016.08.030.
  2. He, J. (2019) A Study of the Formation and Diffusion of Hit Topics in Internet Group Communication. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019. DOI: 10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2019.000224.
  3. Chen, J. (2013) Media Behavioural Deficiencies and Debugging Responses from Controversial Social and Ethical Incidents. Reform and Opening Up, (08):96-97. DOI: 10.16653/j.cnki.32-1034/f.2013.08.038.
  4. Xiong, F., & Yun, L. (2014) Opinion formation on social media: An empirical approach. Chaos 1, 24 (1): 013130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866011.
  5. Kim, K., Baek, Y.M., & N. Kim. (2015) Online news diffusion dynamics and public opinion formation: A case study of the controversy over judges’ personal opinion expression on SNS in Korea. The Social Science Journal, 52(2): 205-216.
  6. Ni, C. (2021) Innovation of Online Public Opinion Guidance Mechanism for Controversial Social Events. Journalism Research Guide,12(15):100-101.
  7. You, K. (2020) Study on the Mechanism of ‘Generating and Responding’ to Public Opinion on Hotspot Events on the Internet. Anhui University. DOI: 10.26917/d.cnki.ganhu.2020.000465.
  8. Leung, F.F., Gu, F.F. & Palmatier, R.W.(2022) Online influencer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50, 226–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00829-4.
  9. Judijanto, L., Sitti H., Muhammad Y., Ni, D. M. S. D., and Bekti S. (2024) The Influence of Social Media Influencer Utilization in Influencing Public Opinion. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2 (01):40-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i01.548.
  10. Weinlich, P., Semerádová, T. (2022) Emotional, Cognitive and Conative Response to Influencer Marketing. New Techno Humanities, 2(1): 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techum.2022.07.004.
  11. Corner, J., & John, H.(1993) Communication Studies: An Introductory Reader (Fourth Edition). London: Arnold Publishers.
  12. Craig, G. (2004) The Media, Politics and Public Life. New South Wales, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
  13. Gordon, F. (2018) The Significance and Impact of the Media in Contemporary Society. In Children, Young People and the Press in a Transitioning Society (Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Marcuse, H. (1964) One Dimensional Man. Sphere Books.
  15. Surette, R. (1998) Media, Crime and Criminal Justice: Images and Realities (Second Edition). California, USA: Wadsworth.