East Asian International Students’ Attitudes Toward Gender Studies in U.S. Higher Education Institutions
Abstract
East Asian international students and gender studies courses are both popular topics in American higher education today. However, little attention has been paid to the performance of East Asian international students in gender studies courses. Therefore, this study explores the attitudes and participation of East Asian international students toward Gender Studies in U.S. higher education institutions. Through a mixed-methods approach, including literature review and interviews, this research identifies the key factors that influence these students' engagement with Gender Studies. The findings suggest that cultural differences, traditional gender norms, and misunderstandings about the relevance of Gender Studies courses contribute to low participation rates. Additionally, the study reveals that many East Asian students, particularly those in STEM fields, avoid Gender Studies due to its perceived theoretical focus and the requirement for extensive writing. By addressing these barriers, educators can develop more inclusive strategies to encourage participation and foster critical thinking skills, contributing to the development of global citizens.
References
- Clark-Taylor, A., Regan, H., & Rotramel, A. (2024). ProMather Center Research Briefs, (5). https://commons.case.edu/mather
- Cranny-Francis, A., Waring, W., Stavropoulos, P., & Kirkby, J. (2017). Gender studies: Terms and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Harman, M. J., & Johnson, J. A. (1995). Cross-cultural sex education: Aspects of age, source, and sex equity. TCA Journal, 23(2), 1-11.
- The Power of International Education. (2019). Number of international students in the United States hits all-time high. The Power of International Education. https://www.iie.org/Why-IIE/Announcements/2019/11/Number-of-International-Students-in-the-United-States-Hits-All-Time-High#:~:text=International%2students%20make%20up%205.5%20percent%20of%20the, increase%20of%205.5%20percent%20from%20the%20previous%20year
- Stanley, J. M. (2013). Gender studies: The demise of feminism or the vision of an inclusive curriculum? Johnson & Wales University.
- Nagalia, S. (2018). Conceptualising gender studies: Curriculum and pedagogy. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 25(1), 79-107.
- DeMuth, D. (2012). Doing feminist and activist learning outcomes: What should students be able to do as a result of this women’s and gender studies project/course/curriculum? Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 35(2), 86-95.
- Ropers-Huilman, R., & Winters, K. T. (2011). Feminist research in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 667-690.
- Woodward, K., & Woodward, S. (2015). Gender studies and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 1(1), 1-5.
- Szalacha, L. A. (2003). The research terrain: A brief overview of the historical framework for LGBTQ studies in education. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 1(2), 77-87.
- Fennell, S., & Arnot, M. (2008). Gender education and equality in a global context. Sociology of Education.
- Pascall, G., & Sung, S. (2007). Gender and East Asian welfare states: From Confucianism to gender equality.
- DiAngelo, R. (2016). White fragility. Counterpoints , 497 , 245-253.
- Mejia, Z. (2023). International college students from Asia on temporary visas flock to STEM degrees, study finds. Journalist’s Resource.
- Andrade, M. S. (2006). International students in English-speaking universities: Adjustment factors. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(2), 131-154.