Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.42> Article
Research Article

The Diversity in College Admission: A Study of Asian American Applicants in Harvard Judicial Case

Jin SunThe Lawrenceville School*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This study investigates the presence and extent of discrimination against Asian American applicants in the college admissions process, particularly in the context of the Harvard University legal case. Using machine learning techniques, we develop an analytical framework to examine publicly available data from judicial documents. Our approach involves creating a two-stage model where we first estimate an auxiliary model to capture the endogenous variable—student performance—and then incorporate these predictions into the primary admissions outcome model. By generating counterfactual scenarios where applicants' racial backgrounds are hypothetically altered, we aim to identify the causal impact of being Asian American on admission outcomes. Our findings indicate that while there is no significant bias against Asian American applicants in academic and extracurricular ratings, strong disparities exist in non-academic ratings, such as personal evaluations. If Asian American applicants received personal ratings comparable to White applicants, their admission rates could increase by approximately 27%, particularly for those with higher academic performance. These results suggest potential biases in the admissions process, warranting further investigation.

Keywords: College Admission; Racial Groups; Counterfactual Analysis.
Published: November 15, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/42/20242487
Volume: CHR Vol.42
pp. 159-172
Download PDF

References

  1. New York Times. “This Is Peak College Admissions Insanity”. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/college-admissions-applications.html.
  2. Long, Mark C. “Race and College Admissions: An Alternative to Affirmative Action?” Review of Economics and Statistics 86, no. 4 (November 2004): 1020–33. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125211.
  3. Dale, Stacy B., and Alan B. Krueger. "Estimating the effects of college characteristics over the career using administrative earnings data." Journal of human resources 49, no. 2 (2014): 323-358.
  4. Niessen, A. Susan M., and Rob R. Meijer. "On the use of broadened admission criteria in higher education." Perspectives on Psychological Science 12.3 (2017): 436-448.
  5. Espenshade, Thomas J., and Alexandria Walton Radford. No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton University Press, 2009.
  6. Espenshade, Thomas J., Chang Y. Chung, and Joan L. Walling. “Admission Preferences for Minority Students, Athletes, and Legacies at Elite Universities*.” Social Science Quarterly 85, no. 5 (December 2004): 1422–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00284.x.
  7. Arcidiacono, Peter, Josh Kinsler, and Tyler Ransom. “Asian American Discrimination in Harvard Admissions.” European Economic Review, no.144:104079, 2022 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3586200.
  8. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
  9. “Plaintiff Expert Witness Rebuttal Report.” In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al., Civil Action No. 14-14176-ADB (D. Mass), Document 415-9, 2018. https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/massachusetts/madce/1:2014cv14176/165519/415/2.html.
  10. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978)
  11. Kirkelie, Steven M. "Higher education admissions and diversity: The continuing vitality of Bakke v. Regents of the University of California and an attempt to reconcile Powell's and Brennan's opinions." Willamette L. Rev. 38 (2002): 615.
  12. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 570 U.S. 297 (2013); 579 U.S. (2016).
  13. “Plaintiff Expert Witness Opening Report.” In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al., Civil Action No. 14-14176-ADB (D. Mass), Document 415-8, 2017. https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/massachusetts/madce/1:2014cv14176/165519/415/1.html.
  14. Totenberg, Nina. "Supreme Court guts affirmative action, effectively ending race-conscious admissions." (2023). NPR https://www.npr.org/2023/06/29/1181138066/affirmative-action-supreme-court-decision
  15. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). "Diversity and Higher Education: Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes." Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330-366.
  16. “Trial Exhibit DX 042. Demographic Breakdown of Applicants, Admits, and Matriculants.” In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al., Civil Action No. 14-14176-ADB (D. Mass), 2018. https://github.com/tyleransom/SFFAvHarvard-Docs/blob/master/TrialExhibits/D042.pdf.
  17. “Trial Exhibit P009. Office of Institutional Research report, ‘Admissions Part II: Subtitle’.” In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al., Civil Action No. 14-14176-ADB (D. Mass), 2018. https://github.com/tyleransom/SFFAvHarvard-Docs/blob/master/TrialExhibits/P009.pdf.
  18. “Trial Exhibit P028. Office of Institutional Research report, ‘Demographics of Harvard College Applicants’.” In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al., Civil Action No. 14-14176-ADB (D. Mass), 2018. https://github.com/tyleransom/SFFAvHarvard-Docs/blob/master/TrialExhibits/P028.pdf.