Discourse Marker Well in British and Hong Kong English: A Comparative Analysis of Scripted and Unscripted Speech
Abstract
This study offers a comparative analysis of the discourse marker well in both British English (BrE) and Hong Kong English (HKE), focusing on its usage in scripted and unscripted speech contexts. Using Beeching's classification framework, 170 instances of well were analyzed to investigate its pragmatic functions, such as signaling hesitation, managing transitions, and structuring discourse. The analysis reveals that well is used more frequently in unscripted speech in both varieties, although BrE speakers tend to use it more for topic transitions, while HKE speakers employ it more frequently to express hesitation. These findings suggest that while well serves universal pragmatic functions, its use is influenced by cultural and linguistic factors in different English varieties. The study also highlights the significance of discourse markers like well in maintaining coherence in conversation, with important implications for teaching English as a second language, especially in multilingual and diverse regions such as Hong Kong.
References
- Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied linguistics, 28(3), 410-439.
- Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. John Benjamins.
- Buysse, L. (2010). Discourse markers in the English of Flemish university students. In I. Witzcak-Plisiecka (Ed.), Pragmatic perspectives on language and linguistics, Vol. 1: Speech actions in theory and applied studies (pp. 461–484). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Romero-Trillo, J. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 769–784.
- Öztürk, Y., & Durmuşoğlu Köse, G. (2021). “Well (ER) you know…”: discourse markers in native and non-native spoken English. Corpus Pragmatics, 5(2), 223-242.
- Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
- Beeching, K. (2016). Well. In Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction(pp. 51–75). Cambridge University Press.
- Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.
- Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
- Schourup, L. C. (1982). Common discourse particles in English conversation. Garland.
- Schourup, L. C. (1999). ‘Tutorial overview: Discourse markers’. Lingua, 107, 227-265.
- Chaudron, C., & Richards, J. C. (1986). The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 113–127.
- Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 325-338.
- Fuller, J. M. (2003). Discourse marker use across speech contexts: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Multilingua, 22, 185-208.
- Kirk, J. M. (2018). The pragmatics of well as a discourse marker in broadcast discussions. In Corpora and Lexis (pp. 140-172). Brill.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
- Müller, S. (2004). “Well you know that type of person”: functions of well in the speech of American and German students: Corpus linguistics. Part II. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(6), 1157–1182.
- Moll, T. M. (2000). EFL content lectures: A discourse analysis of an interactive and a non-interactive style. Departamento de Filología inglesa, Universidad de Alicante.
- Tonio, J. (2021). Pragmatic functions of discourse marker ‘well’in selected spoken discourse of Philippine English. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(3), 189-201.
- Li, M., & Xiao, Y. (2012). A comparative study on the use of the discourse marker well by Chinese learners of English and native English speakers. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5), 65-71.
- Tsui, A. B., & Bunton, D. (2000). The discourse and attitudes of English language teachers in Hong Kong. World Englishes, 19(3), 287-303.