Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.50> Article
Research Article

Parasitic Approach to the Development of Modern Cosmetic Industry

Zhengrong ZhuTemple University Japan Campus* Dariusz P. SkowronskiTemple University Japan Campus

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This is a literature review study focused on the connection between parasite stress and the development of the modern beauty industry. It is hypothesized that parasite stress may consequently result in contributing to females’ consumption of cosmetic products and plastic surgeries. The research begins with how natural selection theory, sexual selection theory, and parasite stress theory are contributing to the shaping of human mate preferences. Two types of consequences of parasitic infections are introduced: facial-benefitting and facial-disrupting. These two types of impact on female faces all result in increasing and reinforcing social comparison among females. The social comparison evolved throughout time contributing to mate selection and modern times manifestations in the cosmetic industry. It is suggested that future research in this field can explore the connection between parasite stress and differences in self-esteem between males and females.

Keywords: Parasite stress; natural selection; sexual selection; social comparison; cosmetic industry.
Published: November 15, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/50/20242494
Volume: CHR Vol.50
pp. 32-38
Download PDF

References

  1. Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2014). The parasite-stress theory of sociality, the behavioral immune system, and human social and cognitive uniqueness. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8(4), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000020
  2. Wolfe, N. D., Dunavan, C. P., & Diamond, J. (2007). Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature, 447(7142), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05775
  3. Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11000021
  4. DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Extending parasite-stress theory to variation in human mate preferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 86–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11000987
  5. El-Beshbishi, S. N., Ahmed, N. N., Mostafa, S. H., & El-Ganainy, G. A. (2012). Parasitic infections and myositis. Parasitology Research, 110(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2609-8
  6. Akst, L. M., Dipasquale, B., Berho, M., Greene, D., & Roberts, J. (2004). Dirofilarial infection presenting as a facial mass: Case report of an emerging zoonosis. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 25(2), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.09.005
  7. Baudouin, J.-Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002
  8. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: Interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. Behavioral Ecology, 19(4), 902–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn049
  9. Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.014
  10. Borráz-León, J. I., Rantala, M. J., Krams, I. A., Cerda-Molina, A. L., & Contreras-Garduño, J. (2022). Aretoxoplasma-infected subjects more attractive, symmetrical, or healthier than non-infected ones? evidence from subjective and objective measurements. PeerJ, 10. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13122
  11. Martin, M. C., & Kennedy, P. F. (1993). Advertising and social comparison: Consequences for female preadolescents and adolescents. Psychology & Marketing, 10(6), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220100605
  12. Marta Kowal et al. (2022). Predictors of enhancing human physical attractiveness: Data from 93 countries. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(6), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.08.003.
  13. Wagstaff, D. L., & Sulikowski, D. (2023). The impact of sexual strategies, social comparison, and Instagram use on makeup purchasing intentions. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 17(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000285
  14. Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2020). Parasite prevalence and income inequality positively predict beardedness across 25 countries. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00132-6
  15. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5
  16. Prokop, P., & Fedor, P. (2013). The effects of parasites on human behaviour: An evolutionary perspective. Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century, 5(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.33225/ppc/13.05.46
  17. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social Media, social comparison, and self-esteem. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e512142015-699
  18. Brown, A., Furnham, A., Glanville, L., & Swami, V. (2007). Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 27(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2007.06.004
  19. Stephenson, I., & Wiselka, M. (2012). Drug treatment of tropical parasitic infections. Drugs, 60(5), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200060050-00002