Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.50> Article
Research Article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Double Reduction Policy in Alleviating Student Pressure

Xinyan ChenDurham University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The Chinese government launched the Double Reduction Policy in 2021, which aims to reduce the excessive academic burden on primary and secondary school students by limiting homework and regulating extracurricular tutoring. The policy was implemented in response to growing concerns about the immense academic pressure students face, which has led to widespread anxiety, sleep deprivation and mental health problems. This paper explores the effects of the double reduction policy on students' academic stress and its limitations. The findings show that although the double reduction policy has achieved some success in reducing students' learning burdens both in and out of school, increasing sleep time, and alleviating anxiety and depression, its effectiveness is limited by the variability of after-school services in schools and the persistence of parents' demand for tutorials. In addition, social prejudice against vocational education and the competitive nature of higher education admissions have not alleviated students' academic pressure. This paper argues that more efforts are needed in the equitable distribution of educational resources, increased recognition of vocational education, and adjustment of parental expectations to reduce students' pressure further.

Keywords: Double Reduction Policy; Social Policy; Student Pressure; Shadow Education.
Published: November 15, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/50/20242367
Volume: CHR Vol.50
pp. 21-26
Download PDF

References

  1. McChesney, R.W. (1999) ‘Noam Chomsky and the Struggle Against Neoliberalism’, Monthly Review, 50(11), p. 40.
  2. Zhang, W. and Yamato, Y., 2018. Shadow education in East Asia: Entrenched but evolving private supplementary tutoring. In Routledge international handbook of schools and schooling in Asia (pp. 323-332). Routledge.
  3. Bray, T.M., 1999. The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
  4. Bray, T.M., 2009. Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring?. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; International Institute for Educational Planning.
  5. Zhao, X. (2015) Competition and compassion in chinese secondary education [Preprint].
  6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019) ‘Pisa 2018 results (volume I)’, PISA [Preprint].
  7. Leung, G.S., Yeung, K.C. and Wong, D.F. (2009) ‘Academic stressors and anxiety in children: The role of paternal support’, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(1), pp. 90–100.
  8. Jiang, W. and Saito, E. (2022) ‘Lightening the academic burden on Chinese children: A discourse analysis of recent education policies’, Journal of Educational Change [Preprint]. doi:10.1007/s10833-022-09470-6.
  9. Wang, D. et al. (2022) ‘Has the “double reduction” policy relieved stress? A follow-up study on Chinese adolescents’, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 16(1). doi:10.1186/s13034-022-00530-6.
  10. Liu, H. et al. (2018) ‘Anxiety in rural Chinese children and adolescents: Comparisons across provinces and among subgroups’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), p. 2087. doi:10.3390/ijerph15102087.
  11. Xue, E. and Li, J. (2022) ‘What is the value essence of “double reduction” (Shuang Jian) policy in China? A policy narrative perspective’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(7), pp. 787–796. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2040481.
  12. Zhou, X. (2021) ‘ Family Capital and Academic Anxiety: parents Anxiety Caused by “Double Reduction” Policy’, J Guangxi Normal Univ, 57(6), pp. 96-106.
  13. Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009) ‘Curriculum reform and “quality education” in China: An overview’, International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), pp. 241–249. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008.
  14. Yu, X. (2020) ‘ Parents’ social background, educational values and expectations’, J Nanjing Normal Univ, 4, pp.62-74.
  15. Chen, G. et al. (2022) ‘Parents’ Educational Anxiety Under the “Double Reduction” Policy Based on the Family and Students’ Personal Factors’, Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, pp. 2067–2082. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S370339.
  16. Ling, M. (2015) ‘“bad students go to vocational schools!”: Education, social reproduction and migrant youth in Urban China’, The China Journal, 73, pp. 108–131. doi:10.1086/679271.
  17. Thurow, L.C. (1975) Generating inequality: Mechanism of distribution in the US economy. New York, US: Basic Books.
  18. Yan, M. (2023) ‘The impact of “General-Vocational Education Stratification” on parental education anxiety among Chinese junior high school students and strategies research’, Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(29). doi:10.25236/fer.2023.062929.
  19. Li, S. (2023) ‘Education investment “rat race” in China: How income inequality shapes family investment in shadow education’, Asia Pacific Education Review [Preprint]. doi:10.1007/s12564-023-09852-2.
  20. Yu, S. et al. (2022) ‘The transformation of parents’ perception of education involution under the background of “double reduction” policy: The mediating role of education anxiety and perception of education equity’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800039.