Research Article

Human-Nature Boundaries: Cultural Heritage, Landscape Ecology, and Healing in the Kumano Kodo

Quan WangUniversity of Westminster*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The Kumano Kodo, an ancient pilgrimage route network in the Kii Peninsula of Japan, serves as a unique case study in the intersection of cultural heritage, landscape ecology, and human-nature relationships. This paper explores the dynamic interactions between human interventions and natural processes along the Kumano Kodo, highlighting how landscape ecology principles illustrate the blurred boundaries between nature and culture. The rewilding of the human-imposed structures, coupled with the restorative experiences of modern pilgrims, reinforces the notion of coexistence rather than dominance over nature. The findings support Turner’s theory of landscape dynamics and Morton’s assertion that the human-nature dichotomy is artificial, showing how human interventions and natural processes coalesce in a living landscape. The study also applies Kaplan’s Attention Restoration Theory to demonstrate the psychological benefits of engaging with cultural landscapes. However, the research is limited by its focus on a specific demographic of pilgrims and calls for more diverse methodologies in future studies. Broader data collection will offer deeper insights into the long-term psychological effects and cultural significance of such heritage sites.

Keywords: Kumano Kodo; cultural heritage; landscape ecology; psychological restoration; ecological resilience.
Published: November 15, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/49/20240185
Volume: CHR Vol.49
pp. 23-28
Download PDF

References

  1. Moira, P., Mylonopoulos, D., & Konstantinou, G. (2021). Tourists, pilgrims and cultural routes: The case of the Kumano Kodo route in Japan. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage, 9(3), 5.
  2. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., & O’Neill, R. V. (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process. Springer.
  4. Hersperger, A. M., Grădinaru, S. R., Pierri Daunt, A. B., Imhof, C. S., & Fan, P. (2021). Landscape ecological concepts in planning: Review of recent developments. Landscape Ecology, 1–17.
  5. Turner, M. G. (2005). Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 319–344.
  6. Naveh, Z., & Lieberman, A. S. (1994). Landscape ecology: Theory and application. Springer.
  7. Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Harvard University Press.
  8. Santangelo, A., et al. (2022). Enhancing resilience of cultural heritage in historical areas: A collection of good practices. Sustainability, 14(9), 5171.
  9. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
  10. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1995). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Ulrich’s Bookstore.
  11. Shi, H., Luo, H., Wei, Y., & Shin, W. S. (2024). The influence of different forest landscapes on physiological and psychological recovery. Forests, 15(3), 498.