Research Article

Analysis of Phenomenon of Tianshui Malatang's Soaring Popularity from a Multimodal Perspective

Chang LiuEast China Normal University*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Contemporary communication studies show that short videos, as the most important form of information dissemination today, have a more multidimensional and immersive communication effect compared to traditional print media and other channels. Since this information medium inherently contains numerous social symbols with expressive characteristics, this paper will analyze the short videos that led to the viral phenomenon of "Tianshui malatang" based on Kress and Leeuwen's visual grammar and Halliday's theories of language as a social semiotic. This paper analyzes the phenomenon of the "Tianshui malatang" a fusion of regional tourism and local specially food that has gone virtual on Chinese short video platforms, using a multimodal discourse analysis approach. The analysis shows that the "Tianshui malatang" video enhances the sensory interaction between the viewer and the screen in terms of visual effects, and in terms of narrative expression, it leads the viewer to generate positive feedback on the video through the presentation of various elements.

Keywords: multimodal; visual grammar; social semiotic; multimodal interaction; visual communication.
Published: November 8, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/47/20242325
Volume: CHR Vol.47
pp. 95-103
Download PDF

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1999). Rhetoric of the Image. Visual culture: The reader, 33-40.
  2. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge
  3. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Edward Arnold
  4. O'Toole, M. (1994). The Language of Displayed Art. Leicester University Press
  5. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. Equinox
  6. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. Routledge
  7. Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Routledge
  8. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. Routledge
  9. Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. Routledge
  10. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge
  11. van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, Music, Sound. Macmillan International Higher Education
  12. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text. In Reading Science (pp. 87-113). Routledge
  13. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-Semiotic Practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29-57
  14. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. Routledge
  15. Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse (pp. 63-109). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  16. O'Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing Ideational Meaning Using Language and Visual Imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443-475
  17. Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A System for Image-Text Relations in New (and Old) Media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337-371
  18. Thibault, P. J. (2000). The Multimodal Transcription of a Television Advertisement: Theory and Practice. In Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age (pp. 311-385). John Benjamins
  19. Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Palgrave Macmillan
  20. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Routledge