Communications in Humanities Research ISSN: 2753-7072
Home> Volumes> Volume CHR Vol.36> Article
Research Article

Information Stratification: An Understanding of Rural Governance in the New Media Era

Chang NiuBeijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture Hongyan LiChina Agricultural University Chunfeng GaoBeijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture*

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Current research on media governance emphasizes the technological aspect of "information" as a tool but lacks sufficient attention to the digital transformation of information subjects. This paper aims to focus on the internal information characteristics of rural governance in the digital age, thus understanding the changes of rural governance subjects in the information society under new media contexts. Based on more than a decade of fieldwork in rural areas of Beijing conducted by the research team, this study employs in-depth interviews and participant observation in a multi-case study, exploring the structural representation of rural governance from an information perspective. The research reveals that in the new media era, rural society, under multiple governance bodies, generates differentiated information stratification, specifically manifesting as instrumental rational information in the formal governance layer, proxy implementation information in the semi-formal governance layer, and livelihood-adaptive information in the informal governance layer. Among these, the authority-driven governance information in the formal layer is the core part of the rural governance system. The subjects and structures of information under multiple governance bodies are interconnected and coexist within the internal field of rural governance, subsequently driving the centralization of formal governance information, the collaboration of semi-formal governance information, and the alienation of informal governance information. This leads to the emergence of orderly information stratification within the multi-layered governance structure. Information stratification deepens the explanatory pathway of multi-layered governance in rural social studies and proposes new perspectives for understanding rural governance issues in the new media era.

Keywords: Information Stratification; Multi-layered Governance; New Media; Rural Areas
Published: October 18, 2024
DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/36/2024BJ1005
Volume: CHR Vol.36
pp. 137-149
Download PDF

References

  1. Bai, H., Li, M., & Liu, Y. (2020). Composite governance: A theoretical explanation of local poverty alleviation pathways—Based on grounded research in 153 poverty-stricken counties. Public Administration Review, 13(01), 22-40, 195-196.
  2. Yin, M. (2016). Diversity and collaboration: Path selection for constructing new relationships among rural governance actors. Jianghuai Forum, (06), 46-50.
  3. Wang, X., Wei, L., & Liu, F. (2018). Path construction of rural governance driven by big data in the new era. Chinese Public Administration, (11), 50-55.
  4. Zhang, Z. (2020). Multi-co-governance: Innovative rural ecological environment governance model under the rural revitalization strategy perspective. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 26(01), 201-210.
  5. Lang, Y. (2015). Towards holistic governance: The current situation of village politics and the direction of rural governance. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 54(02), 11-19.
  6. Wu, G. (2018). Precise poverty alleviation in the transition of national governance—An explanatory framework for the allocation of poverty alleviation resources in rural China. Journal of Public Administration, 15(04), 113-124, 155.
  7. Guo, Z., & Guo, J. (2019). The allocation of production factors and governance structure selection in rural industrial revitalization. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 22(06), 66-71.
  8. He, X., & Tan, L. (2015). Governance in endogenously interest-intensive rural areas: A case study of southeast H town. Political Science Studies, (03), 67-79.
  9. Niu, C., & Li, H. (2020). Research on information relationships in grassroots project systems. Chinese Public Administration, (01), 18-24.
  10. Arrow, K. J. (1985). Informational structure of the firm. The American Economic Review, (2).
  11. Huang, C., & Li, S. (2019). Shareholder relationship networks, information advantage, and corporate performance. Nankai Business Review, 22(02), 75-88, 127.
  12. Luu, N., Cadeaux, J. M., & Ngo, L. V. (2018). Governance mechanisms and total relationship value: The interaction effect of information sharing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(5), 717-729.
  13. Luo, H., & Wang, L. (2013). Research on information hierarchy management. Library Construction, (03), 27-29.
  14. Guan, B., & Liang, J. (2022). The hierarchical utility of digital empowerment. Zhejiang Academic Journal, (03), 14-24, 2.
  15. Bao, J., & Jia, K. (2019). Research on the modernization of the digital governance system and governance capabilities: Principles, frameworks, and elements. Political Science Studies, (03), 23-32, 125-126.
  16. Burgess, P. M. (1975). Capacity building and the elements of public management. Public Administration Review, 35, 705-716 (Special Issue).
  17. Scott, P., & MacDonald, R. J. (1975). Local policy management needs: The federal response. Public Administration Review, 35, 786-794.
  18. Lin, X. (2015). Intergovernmental organizational learning and policy reproduction: The micro-mechanisms of policy diffusion—A case study of the “urban grid management” policy. Journal of Public Administration, 12(01), 11-23, 153-154.
  19. Li, H., Niu, C., & Wang, L. (2019). Farmers’ information acquisition and practices in the network era: A survey based on farmer training in suburban Beijing. Journalism and Communication Studies, 26(04), 45-61, 126-127.
  20. Dong, S., & Dong, X. (2022). Patchwork responses to technological enforcement deviations: An analysis of the occurrence logic of digital governance formalism. Chinese Public Administration, (06), 66-73.
  21. Jain, E. F. (2004). Constructing the virtual government: Information technology and institutional innovation (G. Shao, Trans.). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.
  22. Niu, C. (2022). Agent-based diffusion: Township governance in the context of new media. Chinese Network Communication Research, (01), 82-99, 203.
  23. Li, Z. (2014). “Community governance”: The modern transformation of grassroots rural governance in China. Journal of Humanities, (08), 114-121.
  24. Kosec, K., & Wantchekon, L. (2020). Can information improve rural governance and service delivery? World Development, (125).
  25. Jing, Y. (2018). The logical transition of grassroots governance in rural China—Rethinking the relationship between the state and rural society. Governance Studies, 34(01), 48-57.
  26. Malhotra, C., Chariar, V. M., Das, L. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2007). ICT for rural development: An inclusive framework for e-governance. Adopting E-governance, 216-226.
  27. Text from X village research materials, X Village Smart Rural System Requirements Manual.
  28. Yang, J., & Zhou, Z. (2022). Over-governance: Understanding the connection between the state and individuals in rural China. Public Administration Review, 4(02), 143-166.
  29. Ren, R., Baier, A., Hinz, T., & Schomaker, H. (2017). On the relationship between information management and digitalization. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 475-482.
  30. Du, J. (2020). Technological dissolution of autonomy—An investigation into the governance dilemmas at the village level under the background of rural informatization. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 20(03), 62-68.